Virgil van Dijk

[Leto]

Is this thread still relevant?

It's as relevant as Liverpool are in the title race.

 

[Decepticon]

Is this thread still relevant?

For some..probably gutted that we didn't get him, I rather we go for Inigo Martinez..

 

[SpionBob]

we do have anfield ?ah those glorious European nights,like st Etienne ,and erm Chelsea :)

Most recent big one was Dortmund in 2016 actually. Only The Europa Cup I know but there ya go.

 

[tolmie's hairdoo]

All will become clear very soon when we see our actual business being done.

City are having a good old chuckle at this one.

Contacted by Southampton to see if we still retained an interest from the summer, having laughed them out of court at £50m.

Sometimes all is not what it seems. Southampton were determined to stick it to Liverpool.

This is one occasion when it served not to actually say anything on the reports.

Remember a certain owner asking what was the second highest bid when it came to our sponsorship with Etihad?

 

[richards30]

All will become clear very soon when we see our actual business being done.

City are having a good old chuckle at this one.

Contacted by Southampton to see if we still retained an interest from the summer, having laughed them out of court at £50m.

Sometimes all is not what it seems. Southampton were determined to stick it to Liverpool.

This is one occasion when it served not to actually say anything on the reports.

Remember a certain owner asking what was the second highest bid when it came to our sponsorship with Etihad?

So we definitely have a CB coming in tolm?

 

[Dax777]

All will become clear very soon when we see our actual business being done.

City are having a good old chuckle at this one.

Contacted by Southampton to see if we still retained an interest from the summer, having laughed them out of court at £50m.

Sometimes all is not what it seems. Southampton were determined to stick it to Liverpool.

This is one occasion when it served not to actually say anything on the reports.

Remember a certain owner asking what was the second highest bid when it came to our sponsorship with Etihad?

Huh! So it seems I'm not the only one wh9 thought 60 million was a rip-off :)

 

[1961_vintage]

Remember a certain owner asking what was the second highest bid when it came to our sponsorship with Etihad?

Who was that?

 

[Jalfraag]

Who was that?

John Henry.

 

[EL APACHE TEVEZ]

Mediocre at best he was shit against us.

 

[1961_vintage]

John Henry.

Interesting! Cheers mate.

 

[bluemonkey71]

Did I just read the first salvo of the transfer window by Tolm?

 

[PW]

I'm glad we stepped away from paying 75 million for VVD. Let the red dippers have him and then the "istry" club can't prattle on about buying the league or any of the other bollo kd they roll out on a regular basis.

 

[waspish]

All will become clear very soon when we see our actual business being done.

City are having a good old chuckle at this one.

Contacted by Southampton to see if we still retained an interest from the summer, having laughed them out of court at £50m.

Sometimes all is not what it seems. Southampton were determined to stick it to Liverpool.

This is one occasion when it served not to actually say anything on the reports.

Remember a certain owner asking what was the second highest bid when it came to our sponsorship with Etihad?

So we are buying in January then?

Stick it to Liverpool as in them paying 75m or is it sitting more sinister?

 

[Stoned Rose]

The kid is 27 in 6 months time.

There's no way a player gets to that age without being pounced on by a proper big club if he's any good.

The Dipstons have had their undies pulled right down.

 

[TCIB]

The kid is 27 in 6 months time.

There's no way a player gets to that age without being pounced on by a proper big club if he's any good.

The Dipstons have had their undies pulled right down.

Bloody hell i thought he was about 22. He is still young enough to earn the fee paid, i just thought he would be about 22 not 27.

 

[Stoned Rose]

He's not a top player mate no matter what age he is.

 

[chesterbells]

Interesting! Cheers mate.

ie we were in no mood to be doing Liverpool any favours whatsoever. Such a shame they ended up paying so much over the odds - although unsurprisingly Mills on 5live earlier saying fees shouldnt matter any more, and we should all ignore them (presumably as its not us spunking up the big money...)

 

[kaz7]

The kid is 27 in 6 months time.

There's no way a player gets to that age without being pounced on by a proper big club if he's any good.

The Dipstons have had their undies pulled right down.

I agree,he'll probably turn out to be ok there but he is not a top drawer player and saints have really bent them over

 

[cleavers]

Look at United, they and Mourinho are royally screwed as splurging big money does not guarantee success and although they have spent almost as much as you they are way behind in everything.

In NET terms they actually outspent us last summer, and for fewer (and arguably less quality) players than we brought in.

 

[The Riot Club]

All will become clear very soon when we see our actual business being done.

City are having a good old chuckle at this one.

Contacted by Southampton to see if we still retained an interest from the summer, having laughed them out of court at £50m.

Sometimes all is not what it seems. Southampton were determined to stick it to Liverpool.

This is one occasion when it served not to actually say anything on the reports.

Remember a certain owner asking what was the second highest bid when it came to our sponsorship with Etihad?

If we get Johnny fucking Evans I think it'll be the scousers and rag media laughing at us.

Any chance of signing a centre back who'd improve the team? David Luiz anyone?

Do we even need one - Stones and Ota are superb.