Virgil van Dijk

[PJM1891]

Gotta love RAWK, quick lock the thread when it's bad news!

 

[Cityisland]

Never 70m. Media said Berny would be that price and quickly stood down.

Id say 35 with add ons (due to injury) which may lead to 50mi.

70Mil is like saying a billion. This is not an Austin Powers movie.

 

[MCFC ISRAEL]

Can someone tell me if sunday express is reliable source? Sound weird the 200k wage

 

[PrezIke]

It was reported in the notes to the accounts that it was 32M. Some rag journalist came up with 42.
It is a criminal offence to knowingly report incorrect information.

It's a bitter pill to swallow, but it was 41.4m. Football Leaks posted the contract online as a PDF file:

http://www.mcfcwatch.com/2016/01/20/brace-yourself-mangalas-transfer-fee-is-now-confirmed/

What can now be confirmed is that City paid Porto a total of €30.5m (€30,503,590 to be precise) for the 56.67% of Mangala’s sporting rights that the Portuguese giants owned owned. However, the deal didn’t end there. The contract states that City were then obligated to buy out Mangala’s remaining rights from Doyen Sports (33.3% owners) and Danubio (10% owners)...

Using the power of a calculator, we can conclude that City most likely paid a total of €53.8m, or roughly £41.4m, for Mangala – not the £32m that was widely reported at the time.

​

 

[p.taker]

Was reading his wiki and noticed he signed a 6-year deal May 2016. That will be another reason why the fee will higher than preferred.

 

[Andy Morrisons jock strap]

Guess its the going rate now for a top class CB but with a 20% premium because its City still the lad does'nt set the price and if he can play like he did for Southampton we have an outstanding player. What a physically imposing partnership him and Vinny will be

 

[Cityisland]

 

[moomba]

It's a bitter pill to swallow, but it was 41.4m. Football Leaks posted the contract online as a PDF file:

http://www.mcfcwatch.com/2016/01/20/brace-yourself-mangalas-transfer-fee-is-now-confirmed/

​

What we paid any parties outside of Porto has never been disclosed afaik. People can guess that we paid the same rate as we paid Porto I guess.

 

[MillionDollarDream]

Never 70m. Media said Berny would be that price and quickly stood down.

Id say 35 with add ons (due to injury) which may lead to 50mi.

70Mil is like saying a billion. This is not an Austin Powers movie.

This all day, Bernardo price in the media wasn't correct Benfica had been holding out for €60M, didn't get that. Wish folks would stop focusing on the price tag, we already know the media's angle when it comes to reporting us in the transfer market.

 

[Tueartsoverhead kick]

Anfield is a fucking sewer; full of morose, boring, whining bastards holding candles.

Edited for accuracy :)

 

[Wretched Vengeance]

If this is true and we are prepared to spend 50 million plus on the lad, then he'll most likely command significant weekly salary.

 

[Wretched Vengeance]

Edited for accuracy :)

 

[Tueartsoverhead kick]

No idea who he is but my dipper mate says he's extremely reliable.

Can somebody point out to Kopshite that our average home attendance last season was higher then theirs .....

 

[Jalfraag]

It's a bitter pill to swallow, but it was 41.4m. Football Leaks posted the contract online as a PDF file:

http://www.mcfcwatch.com/2016/01/20/brace-yourself-mangalas-transfer-fee-is-now-confirmed/

​

To think that the directors of a company would risk criminal prosecution rather than state the correct figures in the accounts is laughable.
You've been reading far too much rag propaganda.

 

[Yates]

£60M and 200k a week? That must mean Liverpool were willing to run us close if true as I just can't see Southampton turning down even £50M. Also 200k? So are City throwing the new wage structure in the bin?

 

[cadds92]

£60M and 200k a week? That must mean Liverpool were willing to run us close if true as I just can't see Southampton turning down even £50M. Also 200k? So are City throwing the new wage structure in the bin?

60m is absolute madness when you think about it.

City must want to give Pep the team he wants regardless of cost by the looks of it.

 

[01cravend]

£60M and 200k a week? That must mean Liverpool were willing to run us close if true as I just can't see Southampton turning down even £50M. Also 200k? So are City throwing the new wage structure in the bin?

200k a week? Nah that cant be right. The mans played a season and a half of top league football. He's on 50k a week currently? Offer him 90k+bonuses and the chance to win trophies or stay at Southampton and finish midtable for the forseeable future on his 50k a week 6 year contract.

 

[goalmole]

Though I have seen it before, that is brilliantly done.

 

[goalmole]

No idea who he is but my dipper mate says he's extremely reliable.

And extremely bitter.

 

[Yates]

60m is absolute madness when you think about it.

City must want to give Pep the team he wants regardless of cost by the looks of it.

It is man, I'm just happy we are getting Virgil but trying to logically comprehend this deal is hard. Then again so was the Stones and Mangala deals ( if 42M is correct ).