Citizen of Legoland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Jan 2013
- Messages
- 9,982
I think you're approaching this argument from your usage perspective, which is exceptionally high. You definitely need Virgin Media, that's for sure. I have had wonderful internet from them for 10 years, but now it's a problem.I use ftp to dl and upload files, with 2 threads to a glftpd server 10Gbps .fr i get 230Mb/s.
I have axx to an ftp in manchester i part pay the line to on hyperoptic, the line is great but we only got it due to 25 others in the block signing up.
50 quid full duplex giga, wonderful line but as you note, hard to get.
BT on the other fibre net and are currently under pressure to open their net to others, Virgin has its own lines laid and fully in charge of it's self.
In the next 2 year the nvidia shield base will grow due to true 4k streaming, only virgin will offer this at super high spec consistently.
You can have 4 others doing shit on the line, your kodi rig in 4 rooms will still do hd streams without a glitch.
Basically virgin is future proof more than anyone else.
However for the vast majority of people, today, 50 or 70meg is plenty. I'm not bothered in saving 30mins in downloading a movie, it's not worth paying more for IMHO. Latency and jitter are more important for gaming, faster speed makes no difference whatsoever, and VM are no better (perhaps worse, actually) than anyone else on this.
I download about 300 to 500gig a month in the household just watching movies, browsing, gaming, etc., and when I get the speed I pay for, it performs well.
Of course, 4k will increase demand, but this is still niche. Some people don't even see a difference between SD and HD.