Warnock Sacked

[supercrystal7]

They're a bit trigger happy.Warnock was the 7th manager since 2012.

It's not a good look. Two permanent managers leaving, because they didn't like the board. Two managers just were never good enough and should never have gotten the job.

As bad as Warnock has been I think he deserved the QPR game. Our players clearly don't want to play an expansive game and don't really have the capability for it, but with a proper striker we may have won a couple of the games we drew. Sacking another manager is never a good thing. A lot of fans are happy about it.

 

[IH8MUFC]

Were it not for their 'relationships' with the media and their Britishness, neither Warnock nor Redknapp would still be involved in the game.

What is this based on exactly? Apart from you disliking them. Warnock has 7 promotions in his career as a manager. That along with Dave Bassett is a record in English football.

People don't like to admit but Harry done a good job at Bournemouth, got them promoted, good job at Portsmouth got them promoted/f.a cup (awaits he bankrupted them etc..), excellent job at spurs. Got qpr promoted, leslies damage had been done when he got relegated.

Maybe that's why they have jobs.

 

[I'm no cynic but...]

I dare say he'll soon be back on TalkManure spouting off about "All that money" at the Etihad.

 

[Bill]

should have put money on this a month ago.

 

[pudge]

Good, wonder how long it will take him to claim that offside decision cost him his job?

Warnock was the only negative I had about Palace plus Keith Millen seems like a good bloke.

 

[blueinnewzealand]

Personality and what he says about City aside.

He took over a squad he didn’t put together, a day before the season began and hasn’t been given a transfer window. Thats a raw deal for anyone.

All about money, not about football.

Plus he's a really shit manager, so the odds were really against him.
Tbf though apart from a couple of Pulis buys Warnock did build that squad.

I don’t think he’s a terrible manager, but he is too old fashioned for the top division. Even Pulis was for a while but then developed another string to his bow. Warnock hasn’t done it.

Can’t agree thats his squad, hes had Freedman, Holloway and Pulis in there since he was last time. That’s a fair amount of player turnover.

 

[stony]

Personality and what he says about City aside.

He took over a squad he didn’t put together, a day before the season began and hasn’t been given a transfer window. Thats a raw deal for anyone.

All about money, not about football.

Plus he's a really shit manager, so the odds were really against him.
Tbf though apart from a couple of Pulis buys Warnock did build that squad.

I don’t think he’s a terrible manager, but he is too old fashioned for the top division. Even Pulis was for a while but then developed another string to his bow. Warnock hasn’t done it.

Can’t agreed thats his squad, hes had Freedman, Holloway and Pulis in there since he was last time. That’s a fair amount of player turnover.

They might have been better with Freeman, Hardy and Willis.

 

[Paul Lake's Left Knee]

Plus he's a really shit manager, so the odds were really against him.
Tbf though apart from a couple of Pulis buys Warnock did build that squad.

I don’t think he’s a terrible manager, but he is too old fashioned for the top division. Even Pulis was for a while but then developed another string to his bow. Warnock hasn’t done it.

Can’t agreed thats his squad, hes had Freedman, Holloway and Pulis in there since he was last time. That’s a fair amount of player turnover.

They might have been better with Freeman, Hardy and Willis.

 

[mad4city]

Has anyone been sacked by more clubs than Colin Wanker? He must be rolling in severance pay!

"You can make quite a good living out of being a failure at this game" - Brian Clough.

 

[lefty goldblatt]

They might have been better with Freeman, Hardy and Willis.

They were a shoo-in for that job.