How about it's a way of negotiating a new contract with City in 18 months time?
He has not even played 1 game for City and in Spain they are already saying that Madrid will pay Haaland's 150 million clause in 2024 because by then Benzema will have to be replaced.
Anyway, I would like to know your opinion about Haaland putting a release clause, it is something rare and even more so in England.
In my opinion it doesn't seem to be a sign of commitment to the project, to be honest.
On the other hand, in the strictest sense of the value of the movement it is positive.
City will have the biggest prospect in the world for 2 years and if he leaves after those 2 years the signing will be amortized and they will make a profit on the transfer (if the figures that have come out are what they are, which I doubt).
There are better ways to force the club to renegotiate the contract every year without putting a buy out clause.How about it's a way of negotiating a new contract with City in 18 months time?
City could regotiate a new buy out clause with extended years and Haaland gets a pay rise?
Norwegian expression for eating a lot :)What does "eating like a horse" even mean? Lots of grass and oats?
I thought Uwe had a funny smile on that podcast with Cheesy a little while back.I’ve just read on the City App. that Erling told Colin Rösler that he’d play for us one day.
The two played together for Norway U15s.
Ready for an elite team? He's at one, and why would you be worried about who Madrid sign....you are as irrelevant to them as Scum are to us.There are better ways to force the club to renegotiate the contract every year without putting a buy out clause.
In Barcelona we know this very well unfortunately
The only thing I hope is that he doesn't go to Madrid and City may have made a mistake with that buy out clause.
There were many doubts about Haaland's physical condition these last 2 years, last season Erling missed 16 games.
That is why Erling demanded his club not to publish any more updates on his injuries, so that it would not be an obstacle in his future contract.
City may be taking all the risk of the deal so that in 2 years Madrid can take him more mature and ready for an elite team.
And if he eventually has serious physical problems Haaland will hold on to his contract.
You're here to wind people up aren't you?There are better ways to force the club to renegotiate the contract every year without putting a buy out clause.
In Barcelona we know this very well unfortunately
The only thing I hope is that he doesn't go to Madrid and City may have made a mistake with that buy out clause.
There were many doubts about Haaland's physical condition these last 2 years, last season Erling missed 16 games.
That is why Erling demanded his club not to publish any more updates on his injuries, so that it would not be an obstacle in his future contract.
City may be taking all the risk of the deal so that in 2 years Madrid can take him more mature and ready for an elite team.
And if he eventually has serious physical problems Haaland will hold on to his contract.
Haaland is at an elite club which does not mean he is ready for it, he will have to adapt to the team and the league.Ready for an elite team? He's at one, and why would you be worried about who Madrid sign....you are as irrelevant to them as Scum are to us.
Personally I think you are a condescending twat, who should fuck off and discuss how shite your own team are these days on your own forum ;)
If you came up with anything bordering on coherent I might be prepared to listen.Haaland is at an elite club which does not mean he is ready for it, he will have to adapt to the team and the league.
City is not Dortmund
Instead of attacking me, you should attack the arguments.