well well welll platts the new manager

ancoats

Well-Known Member
Joined
28 Aug 2005
Messages
22,349
why no mancini
but we have to put up with this clowns report of the game from out team view

<a class="postlink" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/9177711.stm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/9177711.stm</a>
 
Platt spent a lot of time kneeling in front of RM before those devastating substitutions.

RM needs to be less reliant on these failed managers and grow some balls.
 
Mancini did an interview:

Roberto Mancini refused to bow to supporter demands to unleash Manchester City's attack and insisted he is under no pressure after Saturday's Birmingham City stalemate.

The Blues repeated their 0-0 draw with Manchester United against Alex McLeish's side as they potentially fell further off the Premier League title pace. Boos rung from the Eastlands terraces as the Italian manager removed striker Carlos Tevez for defensive midfielder Gareth Barry as frustration grew at his dour methods.

Asked for the reason behind his call, a defiant Mancini insisted he was the boss and "it is not football" to throw on centre forwards to chase a winner.

He said: "Because we play with all our players in the box.

"With Carlos [Tevez], he has a little injury for two to three weeks and I thought if I took off the striker and brought on another player we would have some chance to score.

"If you think I put on four strikers and we score four goals, it is not football.

"All the supporters can think like this in here and in Italy, but I must think like a manager.

"The supporters think, 'OK, why don't you put on two, three, four, five strikers?' If the football is like this, I'll put on 10 strikers.

"But, it is not football. We must score when we get a chance.

"We had 17 chances in the second half."

The 45-year-old added: "I am frustrated for these supporters as I want to win. I don't want a draw or loss."

Question marks are sure to grow about Mancini's future at the helm of the richest club in the world after the weekend result. The ex-Inter supremo rubbished talk he was feeling the heat of owner Sheikh Mansour's burning ambition.

He stated: "Which pressure? For what?

"You continue to say I'm under pressure. I'm not [under] pressure.

"We are in fourth position.

"We have some problems, and must improve.

"Which pressure? Because some supporters say 'put two strikers on?' When we have all our players, we can play with balance.

"Maybe we play better, or if we play like today in second half where we played some good football."
 
I thought Platt spoke sense after the game, was obvious Tevez was struggling near the end and he had himself signalled for a substitution.
 
LoveCity said:
Mancini did an interview:

Roberto Mancini refused to bow to supporter demands to unleash Manchester City's attack and insisted he is under no pressure after Saturday's Birmingham City stalemate.

The Blues repeated their 0-0 draw with Manchester United against Alex McLeish's side as they potentially fell further off the Premier League title pace. Boos rung from the Eastlands terraces as the Italian manager removed striker Carlos Tevez for defensive midfielder Gareth Barry as frustration grew at his dour methods.

Asked for the reason behind his call, a defiant Mancini insisted he was the boss and "it is not football" to throw on centre forwards to chase a winner.

He said: "Because we play with all our players in the box.

"With Carlos [Tevez], he has a little injury for two to three weeks and I thought if I took off the striker and brought on another player we would have some chance to score.

"If you think I put on four strikers and we score four goals, it is not football.

"All the supporters can think like this in here and in Italy, but I must think like a manager.

"The supporters think, 'OK, why don't you put on two, three, four, five strikers?' If the football is like this, I'll put on 10 strikers.


"But, it is not football. We must score when we get a chance.

"We had 17 chances in the second half."

The 45-year-old added: "I am frustrated for these supporters as I want to win. I don't want a draw or loss."

Question marks are sure to grow about Mancini's future at the helm of the richest club in the world after the weekend result. The ex-Inter supremo rubbished talk he was feeling the heat of owner Sheikh Mansour's burning ambition.

He stated: "Which pressure? For what?

"You continue to say I'm under pressure. I'm not [under] pressure.

"We are in fourth position.

"We have some problems, and must improve.

"Which pressure? Because some supporters say 'put two strikers on?' When we have all our players, we can play with balance.

"Maybe we play better, or if we play like today in second half where we played some good football."

Clueless. 10 strikers = 10 goals in real life.
 
Instead of people pointing fingers at Mancini, maybe they should be pointing them at that potato headed rag twat Platt.

When he was appointed, there was universal shock at him coming in, and the defence of him was that we should judge him as a coach, not as a rag, not as to his previous pitiful coaching and management record.

Well, a third of the season gone and it cannot be denied we are playing worse than we were last season. He is a serial failure in his career after playing, and it appears he could be the equivalent of Sam Ellis to Peter Reid... a too loyal manager to an inadequate coach.

Wouldn't it just be cheaper to appoint a proper interpreter, and we can then bring in a more experienced and successful coach. It would be nice if we had a first team coach, at the richest club in the world, who actually had some sort of track record to justify his appointment...
 
I was gonna say Platt's interview was one of the most deluded things I've heard but then I read Mancini's. Jesus Christ. Do these two watch a different game to every other person on the planet?

Mancini slagging the fans off isn't gonna help him either!
 
Soulboy said:
Instead of people pointing fingers at Mancini, maybe they should be pointing them at that potato headed rag twat Platt.

When he was appointed, there was universal shock at him coming in, and the defence of him was that we should judge him as a coach, not as a rag, not as to his previous pitiful coaching and management record.

Well, a third of the season gone and it cannot be denied we are playing worse than we were last season. He is a serial failure in his career after playing, and it appears he could be the equivalent of Sam Ellis to Peter Reid... a too loyal manager to an inadequate coach.

Wouldn't it just be cheaper to appoint a proper interpreter, and we can then bring in a more experienced and successful coach. It would be nice if we had a first team coach, at the richest club in the world, who actually had some sort of track record to justify his appointment...


Just ask yourself this...................... who appointed him?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.