Wenger Suggests He May Have Been Offered Job Pre Mancini.

Lordeffingham

Well-Known Member
Joined
1 Oct 2009
Messages
1,012
Interesting article in the Guardian where amongst other things it's suggested by Wenger that after Hughes was sacked our owners sounded him out before they decided on Mancini, and also seems to harbour strong views on the Fergusson conspiracy of an 'Old Boy's' network where strange allegiances and back scratching appears rife.

Wenger Silent On Manchester City Offer
by The Guardian (RSS feed) on 05.Jan.2011 at 6:52

Arsène Wenger's autobiography would be a guaranteed bestseller. For the umpteenth time, the Arsenal manager today reined himself in just as he looked set to spill the beans. Regular Wenger watchers have grown accustomed to his promise to "tell you another day".

The top tantaliser ahead of the home fixture with Manchester City tomorrow night, which he accepted could define his club's Premier League title challenge, concerned when City's Arab owners wanted to appoint him as their manager, which was believed to be after the sacking of Mark Hughes.

"That is certainly not a thing I want to speak about the day before the game," Wenger said. "I never came out with who wanted to sign me."

His true thoughts on the old boys' network of British managers, who often seem to scratch each other's backs, would also make for compulsive reading. Eyebrows were raised last week when, following Darren Ferguson's sacking at Preston North End, his father, Sir Alex, recalled the three Manchester United players who he had on loan at Deepdale and Stoke City's Tony Pulis promptly followed suit with the two that he had there.

Yesterday the United manager praised his friend for the work that he had done at Stoke, while also aiming a dig at Wenger for his criticisms of Pulis's playing style. Wenger can sometimes feel like the outsider. "There is a good togetherness in the Premier League, it looks like," Wenger said, before diving back under the cover of diplomacy. "I do not want to start to think it is not all correct because then you stop your job. I have no suspicion and I do not want to have any suspicion."

Wenger pulled no punches, though, on the subject of City's spending power, which he feels has the capacity to distort the market. City have agreed a £27m fee with Wolfsburg for the striker Edin Dzeko, a player whom Wenger had tracked only to be discouraged by the price. Wenger likened City to the high-rolling gambler, who cared not for his losses.

"You look at the number of players who cost £20m and do not even get on the bench at Man City, and £27m [on Dzeko] is not a risk. It is a risk for me but not for them. If you have £100 in your pocket and you put £90 on a blackjack table, you take a risk. If you have £5m in your pocket and you put £90 on a blackjack table, it is not a risk.

"When I signed in England, this question did not exist. Every club was run within its resources. The Chelseas, the Man Citys are new problems in football.There is no realistic market nowadays because Bayern Munich can as well put €30m on the table, Real Madrid too – plus Inter Milan, Man City. For the super player, there is no realistic market. Dzeko is a super player. He is a little bit like a Dimitar Berbatov type."

One of the £20m-plus players who cannot get a game at City is the former Arsenal striker Emmanuel Adebayor, who, Wenger said, had been badly affected by the armed ambush of the Togo team bus he was on during the Africa Cup of Nations in January last year.

City will look to move Adebayor, possibly on loan which, according to Wenger, raised another ethical question. City have loaned out a number of their players in order to comply with the 25-man squad limit and, in the case of Craig Bellamy, for example, who is at Cardiff City, they have continued to pay his wages. "The problem is when you loan your players out and you pay half of their wages, is that right or wrong?" Wenger said.

Wenger was in bullish mood as he assessed his team's prospects, largely because they have gone into the new year with precious few injuries for a change. With Kieran Gibbs back in full training and Aaron Ramsey due to return tomorrow after his loan spell at Nottingham Forest, where he played five matches, Wenger is without only Manuel Almunia, Thomas Vermaelen and Abou Diaby. "We have changed some of the work we have done, the preventative work. We have as well rotated a lot and that's the main reason some players have not been overloaded."

Wenger confirmed that he would only enter the winter transfer market if Vermaelen, who was "on the fringe of getting back on to the pitch", failed to demonstrate significant progress in recovering from his achilles injury by the end of the month. Would Gary Cahill of Bolton Wanderers feature on the list of potential defensive replacements? "I wouldn't like to give you a name but if Thomas doesn't improve, we will have to look at it," Wenger said.

As so often, the intrigue lay as much in what he did not say.
 
I never minded Arsene Wenger. He sometimes comes off as ridiculous because he defends his players to the bloody end.

If he had the money of the sheikh behind him, I don't think anyone in the Premier League would beat him. He could supplement his areas of weakness with proven talent.

He is a great manager considering the minimal amount of transfer spending to which he is restricted. People call him a glorified scout, that may be true but his scouting abilities are unreal.
 
Lordeffingham said:
by The Guardian (RSS feed) on 05.Jan.2011 at 6:52
His true thoughts on the old boys' network of British managers, who often seem to scratch each other's backs, would also make for compulsive reading. Eyebrows were raised last week when, following Darren Ferguson's sacking at Preston North End, his father, Sir Alex, recalled the three Manchester United players who he had on loan at Deepdale and Stoke City's Tony Pulis promptly followed suit with the two that he had there.

"There is a good togetherness in the Premier League, it looks like," Wenger said, before diving back under the cover of diplomacy. "I do not want to start to think it is not all correct because then you stop your job. I have no suspicion and I do not want to have any suspicion."

Tactful arsene, tactful ;)
 
"Well, ah am very worreed by zis Man Zitty zide and sink zey will beat my team so I weel say zomesing to try and get undair zeir skeens before ze game."

with apologies to Allo Allo for the outrageous French accent
 
NewbBlue said:
If he had the money of the sheikh behind him, I don't think anyone in the Premier League would beat him. He could supplement his areas of weakness with proven talent.
He simply wouldn't spend it and would win nothing.

NewbBlue said:
He is a great manager considering the minimal amount of transfer spending to which he is restricted. People call him a glorified scout, that may be true but his scouting abilities are unreal.
He WAS a great manager. Football has moved on and left him behind.
 
I know Arsenal haven't won anything for 5 years (I think), but to say he was a great manager is a great disservice to him. Despite not winning, they are always up there challenging and play some delightful football. I think he is STILL a great manager and I don't think football has left him behind at all.

You gooners should thank your lucky stars you've got him. You've only got to look at our glorious recent history to see what you could have won!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.