manimanc
Well-Known Member
Just gone 3-1 up with a couple of minutes left.
Pellers is up and running.
Pellers is up and running.
Fucking hell (is all I can say about their first half v Wimbledon)
And a special fucking hell of his own, for Yarmalenko.
What the fuck is Pellegrini doing ? (fucking hell).
I watched the second half in the pub and from what I saw Wimbledon had nothing, it was like watching attack v defence. If West Ham's final ball into the box had been a little better the final score could have easily been 5 or 6-1.The Daily Star (not mine I might add) had the audacity to say that Pellers was lucky - no way was he lucky, the game is 90 minutes long.We absoulutly dominated. 10-1 would have been a fair result. What you going on about ?
We absoulutly dominated. 10-1 would have been a fair result. What you going on about ?
I watched the second half in the pub and from what I saw Wimbledon had nothing, it was like watching attack v defence. If West Ham's final ball into the box had been a little better the final score could have easily been 5 or 6-1.The Daily Star (not mine I might add) had the audacity to say that Pellers was lucky - no way was he lucky, the game is 90 minutes long.
and still won 3-1.It was 'attack against defence' & yes 'Wimbledon had nothing'. They were absolutely worse than useless & had ten men.
That's the point.
West Ham were fucking terrible.
and still won 3-1.
Sometimes when a manager is struggling at a new club they'll take a scruffy win like this to kick start their season - also, they're through to the next round and will be drawn against City.If a couple of late goals v a ten man pub team is a good performance, then they did well.
I thought they were completely inept against a side with no attacking threat, no midfield & no defence, with ten men.
Sometimes when a manager is struggling at a new club they'll take a scruffy win like this to kick start their season - also, they're through to the next round and will be drawn against City.