What are you watching on youtube right now?



He does a lot of decent videos on the differences between living in the US and UK. whats better in each etc ( he prefers the UK ), why things are the way they are in the US like this video about why people dont walk in the US
 
Last edited:
Bigga said:
This has been in my timeline for a couple of days, so I thought I'd put it on.

About 5 mins in, I'm about to turn it off but, then, I get drawn into it.

It's super fascinating to learn about these First Gen and the attempt to build a culture for themselves...

Click to expand...



If you're a Russian you're a Russian.

If you're British you're British.

This obsession with putting a colour before nationality is divisive no wonder people have problems.
 
Yes, I know this is going to fry somebody's chips. I don't really care.

The reason I'm posting this clip is because of the argument held by both sides. I would have found something without 'Poor Mans Podcast' interjections, but I found I agreed with a larger portion of his responses than I disagreed.

With that said, this NOT about Tate, but the discussion he and his opponent hold in front of two young men, who looked (to me, at least) persuaded on the principles of Tate's argument itself.



The question is (without the small ad hominems on either side); does his FOUNDATIONAL argument hold?
 
I like AutoShenanigans. I'm not a motorhead, but I'm a bit of a history and geography geek ( odd for a female foc). Jon is very informative and entertaining.

I watch Jonny Morris on TypicalCity9320, he amuses me, as well as telling it like it is.

I quite like watching music vids, anything from the mid 60s onwards.

I can't watch a full programme though on YouTube, prefer it on a TV channel.


I prefer to watch on our 75" tvs as well, not into watching on the laptop/tablet/ phone.


I refuse to pay for ad free, but will probably succumb one day because they send me nuts!
 
Bigga said:
Yes, I know this is going to fry somebody's chips. I don't really care.

The reason I'm posting this clip is because of the argument held by both sides. I would have found something without 'Poor Mans Podcast' interjections, but I found I agreed with a larger portion of his responses than I disagreed.

With that said, this NOT about Tate, but the discussion he and his opponent hold in front of two young men, who looked (to me, at least) persuaded on the principles of Tate's argument itself.



The question is (without the small ad hominems on either side); does his FOUNDATIONAL argument hold?
Click to expand...


You lost me at Britney ;-)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top