ElanJo said:
Mr Partridge said:
Manchester City = Public enemy number one now thanks to that so called fan. Cheers for that mate. It means a lot to me to be proud of my club in defeat as well as victory, obviously a damn sight more than it does to you you arsehole. Genuine fans like myself can't afford tickets these days but went every week during the dreadful Pearce era, and people like you use up the tickets instead.
Hate the rags as much as anyone but what I hate more than anything is when somebody takes away the sheer pride I have for City, feeling ashamed of your own fans is much worse than any defeat. The Rags have had so many jammy victories over us in the past you'd think we'd be used to it by now.
44, 678 City fans in the stadium didn't act like vile lowlife ***** so why concentrate on 2 or 3?
Try telling that to the media who will make us out to be the scum of the earth. It only takes 2 or 3 to do something stupid.
-- Sun Dec 09, 2012 4:36 pm --
ElanJo said:
Mr Partridge said:
Manchester City = Public enemy number one now thanks to that so called fan. Cheers for that mate. It means a lot to me to be proud of my club in defeat as well as victory, obviously a damn sight more than it does to you you arsehole. Genuine fans like myself can't afford tickets these days but went every week during the dreadful Pearce era, and people like you use up the tickets instead.
Hate the rags as much as anyone but what I hate more than anything is when somebody takes away the sheer pride I have for City, feeling ashamed of your own fans is much worse than any defeat. The Rags have had so many jammy victories over us in the past you'd think we'd be used to it by now.
44, 678 City fans in the stadium didn't act like vile lowlife ***** so why concentrate on 2 or 3?
Try telling that to the media who will make us out to be the scum of the earth. It only takes 2 or 3 to do something stupid.