The expiry date is more of an incentive for clubs to buy the players. We can make it 4 years. No expiry date though would probably detract clubs. We probably can't convince a club that we can buy the player back after 6 or 7 years when they are in their prime.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
What if we said no more loans, sell but with buyback
- Thread starter WallyA
- Start date
There is also a saving on wages. When kelechi and Unal were sold last year buy back clauses were put in place. In Unal's case he was not eligible to play with us this season and in Kelechi case he would struggle to get game time and we made a profit on both. If either proves good enough for us to buyback them I think it is good business. There is a part of me that wishes we could have held on to these players as no matter how well they do we are now in a position that we are only competing for the very best hence Maffeo Unal Kelechi etc. will never be back.
The expiry date is more of an incentive for clubs to buy the players. We can make it 4 years. No expiry date though would probably detract clubs. We probably can't convince a club that we can buy the player back after 6 or 7 years when they are in their prime.
Makes sense! Cheers!!
All 3 of those players can still prove to be one of the best prospects, given another 3 years and the fact they are very young. Maffeo in particular I think will very much be worth it.There is also a saving on wages. When kelechi and Unal were sold last year buy back clauses were put in place. In Unal's case he was not eligible to play with us this season and in Kelechi case he would struggle to get game time and we made a profit on both. If either proves good enough for us to buyback them I think it is good business. There is a part of me that wishes we could have held on to these players as no matter how well they do we are now in a position that we are only competing for the very best hence Maffeo Unal Kelechi etc. will never be back.
citymad
Well-Known Member
Chelsea are a bunch of tossers!
I can't see him leafing the dipper vermin anytime soon. He'll romaine there until Dick Advocado comes in to buy him.
BlueAnorak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 26,176
Always wondered how buy backs work if the player decides he doesnt want to return?
Basically, they don't work.
You insert a sell-on clause. 50% of any sale on top of the fee. As per Kelechi Iheanacho (and provably Maffeo).
I
I
IH8MUFC
Guest
Loans are just a fancy way of saying a player isn't good enough to play for the club that loaned them. Chelsea have 38 players on loan. With a first team squad with 2-3 players in every position. It's all a waste of time.
No doubt someone will bring up Kane for example of it working. Even though for every Kane, (and he only got a chance because Soldado was playing s###) there's hundreds of times it has lead no where. In terms of the player going on loan becoming a regular starter at the club who loaned them.
I'd prefer for the loan system just to be scrapped altogether.
No doubt someone will bring up Kane for example of it working. Even though for every Kane, (and he only got a chance because Soldado was playing s###) there's hundreds of times it has lead no where. In terms of the player going on loan becoming a regular starter at the club who loaned them.
I'd prefer for the loan system just to be scrapped altogether.
M
M
manchester blue
Guest
Go to 12:30, the chairman basically agrees with me :)
He's bloody clueless though!