What Is lacking?

Did it work ,no, but it made sense he knew Chelsea would play a back 5 and 2 holding, even the front 3 dropping deep,he knew they would play on the break , so playing Sterling and Mahrez high and wide to try and stretch their block and create space in the middle for Foden, Bernardo, KDB to operate in with Gundogan feeding made complete sense. Playing no conventional dm when he knew they would play long balls in the channels by passsing c.m also made sense. Did the changes work obviously they didn’t but let not pretend there wasn’t a plan to it that made some sense.
Best post I've read on here all day
 
Over a long season we are the best team in the league but maybe the false 9 thing is insufficient against the best and in the big one-off games and was only ever used out of necessity. ‘Different of course if that false 9 was Messi, especially as an emerging talent in his early Barca days. We don’t have a player, including Phil, on that level.

We need a top class striker. A player that contributes more than goals but provides a focal point, scares defenders and provides unexpected solutions when the team runs out of ideas. I still think that Gabby has a rotational role to play but he hasn’t kicked in to become the world-beater that we perhaps hoped for when we signed him. I just wonder whether the club will value him more as a makeweight asset, particularly if we go all out for Kane or Haaland. I’d be delighted if we signed either one of them but feel that Kane would be the best fit for the here and now.
 
That 1 change completely changed the way we play.

Don't know if you've noticed but Gundogan isn't an holding midfielder and Foden was out of position.
It didn't. Chelsea changed the way we played. They snuffed out our passing channels very well.
We were the team that made the mistake. Originating from stones and Dias being attracted to the ball way too high up the pitch. Then zinchenko not tracking his man.
Maybe would have won with Fernandinho, maybe not... but we didn't "do a Lyon"
No excuses. We fucked it.
 
It didn't. Chelsea changed the way we played. They snuffed out our passing channels very well.
We were the team that made the mistake. Originating from stones and Dias being attracted to the ball way too high up the pitch. Then zinchenko not tracking his man.
Maybe would have won with Fernandinho, maybe not... but we didn't "do a Lyon"
No excuses. We fucked it.
I'm not saying we would of won it with Fernandinho I'm just saying it was a crazy decision to drop one of your best players for a player who's been shite since December. Chelsea didn't make us start with Gundogan in holding midfield, just because he's a world class manager doesn't mean he can't be criticised.
 
Pace,pace and pace. Too many slow players. This is the premier League with its helter skelter football not Italy or Spain.
The fucking about without a striker and left back is beyond stupid.
What does pace do against a deep back 5 , 2 holding and a deep 3 forwards, think the bt graphic showed 17 m between the defenders and forwards, pace with no space for it isn’t how to break down an organised deep defence.
 
I'm not saying we would of won it with Fernandinho I'm just saying it was a crazy decision to drop one of your best players for a player who's been shite since December. Chelsea didn't make us start with Gundogan in holding midfield, just because he's a world class manager doesn't mean he can't be criticised.
I agree, he is there to be shot at with strange changes. I could see the plan, but it didn't work when all the evidence contrary said it would.
This game was lost at Wembley and Etihad. That was where the belief and balance of power tipped.
 
City - A DM in a big game, stones and Dias on their right sides in a big game and Chelsea need a number 9 and they would have put the game to bed in the first 20 mins.
 
We need some muscle in the team we look so small against the likes of Utd & Chelsea. Their physical presence & strength really causes our midfield issues. Grealish would be a good start for me with Kane up front
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.