What price for success?

BlueMoonRisin’

Well-Known Member
Joined
18 Aug 2009
Messages
25,374
Location
Somewhere talking sensible nonsense ; )
Having just read on another thread that category A games are now £56, made me think we have become the monster we all hate. Most are now digging deep into their pockets to pay for the success, and the catalyst to this was winning the league. I suppose the warning signs were there when we had a choice to stump up an extra 50 notes to platinum in order to buy 'loyalty'.

I can afford to go to games at the moment, but if prices are to continue the way they are, I and many other working class fans will be priced out, replaced by newer more affluent fans, and I feel that day will sadly come for many loyal blues who've been going many years in support and unwaivering dedicated loyalty,will no longer afford to go.

I think the club could become the monster we all feared and hated if the prawn sarnie brigade are preferred over the true City supporters that initially attracted ADUG to invest in us.

Pride of Singapore? You bet!
 
I fear this was always going to happen. Success on the pitch has only happened as a result of significant financial investment. Unfortunately, unlike happened 10 yrs ago with Chelsea, this has coincided with the arrival of FFP thanks to Mr Platini. The club has to balance the books now, hence the hike in ticket prices.
As a top club we make far less than the others from the corporate side and this will eventually be addressed by stadium expansion plans. However in the interim the paying fans are going to be asked to shoulder some of the financial burden.
I have no doubt if it was up to them our owners would not have gone for the price increase we are seeing. Truth is with FFP, I suspect continuing as we were is not a sustainable option...
 
Dunne's own goal said:
Feel free to send your "Thank you" messages to the twat Platini.

Stop blaming Platini for all this, when it just isn't the case.

The price increase is a business (on the back of a success) monopolising on the vibe around their customers from this recent success by demanding more for their product.

if sales went down for this game and the 9000 seats that are there for non sc holders were all empty, you can guarantee the club would resort to lowering the prices.

But being good loyal customers that we are, I can guarantee the stadium will be packed.

£56 to watch a team that was in the championship last season?
it's taking the piss....However if you don't want to pay someone else will and the club know this....

Safe Standing with a promise of lower ticket prices for these Standing areas is what's needed in our game, not just at City.

Keep the seats in the family areas, if you want a seat you got it, but behind the goals (114/117) should be safe standing, moving the away fans into the corner.

One day this game will price out even those of us with higher disposable incomes and the players will be still paid £150,000pw in front of empty stadiums, with everyone sat in pubs watching the match.

Stop the Rot... Stop the money leaving this game into the hands of greedy bastard Agents and Players, and Introduce Safe Standing - Reasonable pricing structure for fans.

This won't happen until they have raped us all dry.
 
I recognize completely that this was kind of inevitable, if we became successful. I also recognize that it's just the first game of the season, other games may not be this expensive.

However, I do feel that they club has made a mistake in classing this as a category A game, if not in terms of the level of opponent then it was a poor piece of PR - the press will jump on this, and as we have seen fans get upset and overreact with worry about their beloved City. And making those poor sods pay £52 just to get in? I didn't like it when Chelsea did it to us, I can't support us doing it to others.

But the bigger issue for me is that I already seeing others moving away, accepting that they won't be watching City live anymore because it's too expensive a commitment. And that's a real shame. Because their kids won't grown up City fans, most likely.

Of the group of 6 of us that are now all blue card members, who also paid for priority tickets, I think we all pretty much feel that was £25 each down the drain now. Three of us are even taking about watching live footy elsewhere, lower league stuff. Of course, we'll always be City through and though, always. But as football fans if we can't afford to see our beloved City a few times a season, which for us is usually a day's socializing too, then I can see us doing it elsewhere, for the beer and footy.

So, yes, I hate it. I hate what we're becoming. Most likely I''ll be sat in a pub telling people about how great city are, how I used to go but don't any more but I have the new top so that means I'm still a fan, how I watch another team every now and then to get a live footy thrill. Sound familiar? If i sprout a cockney accent and start classing my sky card as my season ticket, then just put me down.

I hope I'm wrong. i hope it's an overreaction. I hope that when we're drawn at home to Cheltenham in the FA Cup tickets are reduced to £15 to sell seats, as that I can go and use my blue membership.

It's a business, I understand that. Whoever is prepared and able to pay the asking price, they get the seat, they get the experience. I just completely hate the idea that the club, by doing this, is suggesting to me that I am not the kind of supporter they want or need anymore. Twenty five bloody years of my life, pissed wet through at Gigg Lane, just plain pissed at Bloomfield Road, crying in to my dad's shoulder at relegation in 96, and 98, screaming like a loon at Wembley. Putting off holidays, even my bloody wedding, so that I could see the blues play. Remember City, true fans are not bought.

Maybe City are right. Maybe it is better for the club to have fans who will pay and follow at all costs, regardless. It's sensible business acumen - push the price up and discover your most loyal fans. If loyalty means readiness to spend, that is. Rather than me, who needs to pick and choose his games nowadays - can I afford t this month, and am I free that day plus the two days either side, just in case Sky move it again?

The solution? Hopefully it's just an alarmed reaction to having a Cat A game first game of the season, against plainly Cat C opponents. But football costs nowadays, and watching the top teams live is something only reasonably an option for those with the disposable income, or those who truly are prepared to sacrifice other things in order to have the match day experience. Me, I have a young family to think of now and far too many bills. My dad has just received his notice of redundancy. Seeing City live at least a few times a years is important to us, but nowhere near as important as it used to be. And for £51-56 for Southampton, well, we'll just end up watching it is some pub, spending half that amount on beer and a meal with the family. I just regret that I will find it so much harder to bring my kids into the City fold, then my Dad did with me.

At the end of the day, I guess it's my problem, having to come to terms with watching on telly or in a pub, not actually being there. Can't blame a guy for not liking the idea of that.

*edit* I've just heard, 2 of the other 5 in our group are all going to ask to be refunded for their blue member cards + priority option. Not sure if I will yet, bit of an overreaction imo, and anyway T&Cs seem to say it's not possible.
 
It's not just to see Southampton is it though? It is a huge occasion. First game of the season as defending champions.

As I said elsewhere it was £52 for Liverpool midweek just after New Year last season.
 
Don't know about the ' Monster that we ( might ) have become ' but £56 for a football match is a fucking liberty. As someone has mentioned, hopefully it's only for a few of the top matches but what do the others cost ? I paid £40 for most last seaon - I have to come up from Kent so added to the travel, it's not a cheap day out.

Hopefully though -we will charge the same to away fans such as Chavski, Fulham, Q. P. R. etc. who charge us extortiante prices for away tickets at their places - Fulham, QPR are dire grounds as well.

Like we need the money...................

I fear I'll be watching more City games on SKY this coming season rather than being there......
 
"Premier League Champions Add £10 To Fortnightly Ticket Price"

"THE MONSTERS!!!!!!"
 
salfordblues said:
Our season ticket is best value for money in the league.
The best value for money tickets are the cheapest. We don't have the cheapest.

When it comes to football it's not like buying your food shopping from Tescos; we go when they're shit, we go when they don't score, we go when we get relegated, we go when we've got no hope...we don't go to see goals and see trophies won...we don't buy food that tastes like shit!

If - like other club's fans laughably say - Sheikh Mansour got bored of City or the oil ran out and he sacked us off and we ended up as a Conference side, I'd still happily go and watch them.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.