What price for success?

Prodigal Son said:
It's not just to see Southampton is it though? It is a huge occasion. First game of the season as defending champions.

As I said elsewhere it was £52 for Liverpool midweek just after New Year last season.
I kind of understand this as it will be fantastic to see the lads running out as defending champions, but at the end of the day you're paying for 90 mins of football. That's the product, the quality and result isn't guaranteed. We could play terribly - I remember the last game at Maine Road against Southampton. Plus, the Liverpool match was on a bank holiday wasn't it?
 
It goes hand in hand...
Cheap prices=no goals, dire football,Stuart Pearce
Higher prices=lots of goals,world class footballers,Champions of England
I know which one I would choose even if I was priced out of it.
For my club to overtake the scum in my lifetime I would have sacrificed never seeing the blues in the flesh again.
We cannot have it both ways...
 
danburge82 said:
salfordblues said:
Our season ticket is best value for money in the league.
The best value for money tickets are the cheapest. We don't have the cheapest.

When it comes to football it's not like buying your food shopping from Tescos; we go when they're shit, we go when they don't score, we go when we get relegated, we go when we've got no hope...we don't go to see goals and see trophies won...we don't buy food that tastes like shit!

If - like other club's fans laughably say - Sheikh Mansour got bored of City or the oil ran out and he sacked us off and we ended up as a Conference side, I'd still happily go and watch them.

Value for money is the difference between what you see and what you pay, all of which is relative to what others fans see and pay

We see the best team playing the best football yet don't pay top dollar, that's value.
 
Prodigal Son said:
It's not just to see Southampton is it though? It is a huge occasion. First game of the season as defending champions.

As I said elsewhere it was £52 for Liverpool midweek just after New Year last season.

On a personal basis happy to pay it for the reason above as well as I will be one of the lucky ones who will be able to say it is the second time they have will have witnessed City start the season as Champions.

First time I was 14 and watched it with my Dad the man who introduced me to being a Blue,he is now sadly stood on the Kippax in the sky .
 
Alan Oakes Shinpads said:
Prodigal Son said:
It's not just to see Southampton is it though? It is a huge occasion. First game of the season as defending champions.

As I said elsewhere it was £52 for Liverpool midweek just after New Year last season.

On a personal basis happy to pay it for the reason above as well as I will be one of the lucky ones who will be able to say it is the second time they have will have witnessed City start the season as Champions.

First time I was 14 and watched it with my Dad the man who introduced me to being a Blue,he is now sadly stood on the Kippax in the sky .


Sadly the days of dad's introducing their sons/daughters to City (live) could be coming to an end
 
Burtonblue said:
I fear this was always going to happen. Success on the pitch has only happened as a result of significant financial investment. Unfortunately, unlike happened 10 yrs ago with Chelsea, this has coincided with the arrival of FFP thanks to Mr Platini. The club has to balance the books now, hence the hike in ticket prices.
It has nothing to do with FFP, the increase in match day ticket prices once a fortnight would not pay one of our players each week 13000x£5. Its what happens when you get success, there is more demand, more demand means higher prices. I posted in the other thread about why the sort of loyal supporter we have is not the sort of supporter that maximises revenue, and any successful business has to try to do that in all revenue streams.
 
cleavers said:
Burtonblue said:
I fear this was always going to happen. Success on the pitch has only happened as a result of significant financial investment. Unfortunately, unlike happened 10 yrs ago with Chelsea, this has coincided with the arrival of FFP thanks to Mr Platini. The club has to balance the books now, hence the hike in ticket prices.
It has nothing to do with FFP, the increase in match day ticket prices once a fortnight would not pay one of our players each week 13000x£5. Its what happens when you get success, there is more demand, more demand means higher prices. I posted in the other thread about why the sort of loyal supporter we have is not the sort of supporter that maximises revenue, and any successful business has to try to do that in all revenue streams.
The players salaries are not the issue here. It's all about demonstrating financial growth. The corporate side is where all big clubs make a high percentage of their match day revenue. At City we are currently not able to maximise this due to the ground infrastructure and moves are in place to address this in the stadium expansion plans. Until then, the only way to increase match day revenue is to increase ticket prices. I do believe our owners understand where the club is from and I would not panic just based on ticket prices for the opening match of the season especially when it's our first game as champions.
 
bluetonium said:
I kind of understand this as it will be fantastic to see the lads running out as defending champions, but at the end of the day you're paying for 90 mins of football. That's the product, the quality and result isn't guaranteed. We could play terribly - I remember the last game at Maine Road against Southampton. Plus, the Liverpool match was on a bank holiday wasn't it?

From memory it wasn't a bank holiday cos I had to race from work to get there. Was first day back after the break I think.

Any game can be rubbish though. 20 quid or 40 quid. Football bases its 'value for money' on demand not quality (although usually they are more linked than our Soton opener) and with everything surrounding this game it is in demand.

Were we playing them on a November Tuesday it would be £32 proving the point it's not about the opponent?
 
Liverpool make £41m matchday revenue compared to our £27m from a smaller, worse ground. You can't say Liverpool is a more affluent area than Manchester. The rags make £109m (much bigger ground obviously).

It was going to happen
 
bluemoondays said:
Liverpool make £41m matchday revenue compared to our £27m from a smaller, worse ground. You can't say Liverpool is a more affluent area than Manchester. The rags make £109m (much bigger ground obviously).

It was going to happen
My point entirely.
Our match day revenue is much lower than other currently "less successful" clubs and this is mostly due to a relative lack of corporate facilities. That's where the big bucks are. It's going to be up to fans to keep supporting the club as ironic as it may sound given all the money behind our owners....
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.