Bill
Moderator
rooney, if we had him we would'nt need the rest.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
who in the England squad would we have in the City squad ?
- Thread starter dick slexia
- Start date
Rooney, Cole (A), Gerrad, Milner.
King i think is a great player but the best defences are the ones that play together for years and King just doesnt stay fit enough to plan for the future and leads to too much swapping and changing.
King i think is a great player but the best defences are the ones that play together for years and King just doesnt stay fit enough to plan for the future and leads to too much swapping and changing.
If your talking about squad then you should be picking more than 2-3 names. SWP is in City's SQUAD, therefore, Lennon would get in the squad, as would J. Cole or Milner. Ireland is in the Squad, so pretty much any of the centre mids in Englands team would get in. I think you see where i'm going.
difficult question i wish we would have had these in our squad this season
g.johnson (better than what we had)
a.cole (same again)
lampard (for the box to box midfielder instead of gerrard cause ndj ain't moving for no mountain never mind no man so can only have one)
rooney (but only on a free not givin the rags money)
crouch (better option than santa cruz)
defoe (would have turned a few of those draws against the slower teams into wins with his pace up front)
but if the question is who in the england squad would i like to see us sign then i think only
a.cole (world class would get in any team)
lampard (still a 20 goal a seaon man bags of experience and still has incredible stamina)
rooney (only on a free never going to help the rags pay off the debt end of)
the others i honestly think there are better alternatives on the market.
anybody agree?
g.johnson (better than what we had)
a.cole (same again)
lampard (for the box to box midfielder instead of gerrard cause ndj ain't moving for no mountain never mind no man so can only have one)
rooney (but only on a free not givin the rags money)
crouch (better option than santa cruz)
defoe (would have turned a few of those draws against the slower teams into wins with his pace up front)
but if the question is who in the england squad would i like to see us sign then i think only
a.cole (world class would get in any team)
lampard (still a 20 goal a seaon man bags of experience and still has incredible stamina)
rooney (only on a free never going to help the rags pay off the debt end of)
the others i honestly think there are better alternatives on the market.
anybody agree?
city bairn
Well-Known Member
Crouch,Rooney,J.Cole, A.Cole,Milner,Gerrard,Lampard and Dawson would all do a job in our squad. Lets not kid ourselves.
city bairn
Well-Known Member
King is the best English centre-half but hes injured even more than Wio.
you really think so, i think king is a class above terry , but im not sure hes better than gobshitecity bairn said:King is the best English centre-half but hes injured even more than Wio.
city bairn
Well-Known Member
dref619 said:you really think so, i think king is a class above terry , but im not sure hes better than gobshitecity bairn said:King is the best English centre-half but hes injured even more than Wio.
I can honestly say I think he is better than Wio. Without his pace Ferdinand is a run of the mill, clumsy centre-half.