Who is the "spare" £100m earmarked for?

Re: Who is the "spare" £100m earmarked for?

plongo said:
conservatively around £250-300M (not just for transfers, but including incremental wages)

wouldn't that partly answer your question, even if it just means wages for the upcoming year then ours will be 50m+ more than they were twelve months ago.

we'll end up spending far more on wages than transfers over the next few years.
 
Re: Who is the "spare" £100m earmarked for?

plongo said:
It looks (to me) like this is muck or nettles time for the project's initial phase.
Let me explain, recent reports suggest that our owners told MH around the Jan. window not to worry about not getting Parker and Toure as" were not going to go down" the message seemed to be, OK youv'e got good foundations with Given, De Jong etc onboard, let's keep our powder dry until the Summer window and then go for it.

Now then, to me "go for it" from our owners is not a small statement, I read into this, and judging by the realisation of sales of banking shares (huge amount) that our backers are lobbing a big sum into the pot, I reckon, conservatively around £250-300M (not just for transfers, but including incremental wages)

So far we spent £12M, it looks like a further 50 for Tevez and Eto', the perhaps Lescott at 12, Toure at 10 RSC at 18, G Johnson at 15 and say another 20 fora couple of "b" listers, that adds up to £87M,

If this were fact, or even near, there would still be way over £100M in the pot

Who are the "a" listers that we could bring in with this amount?

Our owners are very serious people, they will not entertain being second best, OK they seem patient, keeping Hughes is eveidence of this, but they ALWAYS ALWAYS get what they want eventually

12M+50M+12M+10M+18M+15M+20M ADDS UP TO 87M??? GLAD U DONT WORK IN MY BANK M8. LOL
 
Re: Who is the "spare" £100m earmarked for?

errrrrrrr KAKA maybe?

and where dya get 80 million from thats well over 100
 
Re: Who is the "spare" £100m earmarked for?

banbury_blue said:
I don't think there is an actual figure in mind for Hughes to work with, Personally I think it is just based purely on the players that he wants to bring in.

Agreed, i think hughes has as much money as he wants, I think however, they do not want to be seen paying rediculous wages, or stupid sums of money for average players. So if deals can be done at the right price, they will, regardless of cost.

The one break to the mould maybe kaka though. (who I personally dont think we need)
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.