Silva Citizen
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Nov 2013
- Messages
- 741
A conversation with Ric on another thread got me thinking.
Especially in light of recent events, Pep coming in, Pellers going out. Who actually picks the team.
The first team has looked lethargic for months, we have all seen the threads about slow build up, slow defenders, lack of camaraderie etc.
Today (Chelsea cup) many of the kids showed that they are ready to at least be introduced gradually / individually to the first team. As Ric pointed out, todays team selection must have been either rubber stamped or picked at the insistence of the hierarchy.
I am in no way suggesting that we should play all of the kids all of the time, but the pace of there play is what we need to inject into the first team. The "spin" from the club is that all teams shall play the same and that the EDS is there to develop the future.
We generally agree the likes of Yaya, MDM, Willie, will definitely be moved on in the next window, whilst Kolarov, Zabba, Clichy, Navas, Silva (unfortunately) all have question marks over there futures. So we are in a rebuilding process.
Is Pelligrini picking the team upon loyalty / name or other reasons
Are the hierarchy trying to keep the values of certain players up by insisting upon playing them ?
I for one cant understand why we try to put square pegs into round holes instead of using the emerging talent to fill the gaps, especially at this point when we need to know who can adapt to the first team, and where we need to concentrate the summer spending.
I can't see Pep coming in and accepting others picking the team or players for him -or will he, is this the way they worked at Barca ?
So right now, (and I am not calling Pellers because whatever the situation the results are still our best under a single coach (not manager)) who is rubber stamping team selection, and on what basis is the team being selected.
Whatever it is, today aside, most agree that the way we are shuffling round to cover injuries is not producing our best football and results.
Especially in light of recent events, Pep coming in, Pellers going out. Who actually picks the team.
The first team has looked lethargic for months, we have all seen the threads about slow build up, slow defenders, lack of camaraderie etc.
Today (Chelsea cup) many of the kids showed that they are ready to at least be introduced gradually / individually to the first team. As Ric pointed out, todays team selection must have been either rubber stamped or picked at the insistence of the hierarchy.
I am in no way suggesting that we should play all of the kids all of the time, but the pace of there play is what we need to inject into the first team. The "spin" from the club is that all teams shall play the same and that the EDS is there to develop the future.
We generally agree the likes of Yaya, MDM, Willie, will definitely be moved on in the next window, whilst Kolarov, Zabba, Clichy, Navas, Silva (unfortunately) all have question marks over there futures. So we are in a rebuilding process.
Is Pelligrini picking the team upon loyalty / name or other reasons
Are the hierarchy trying to keep the values of certain players up by insisting upon playing them ?
I for one cant understand why we try to put square pegs into round holes instead of using the emerging talent to fill the gaps, especially at this point when we need to know who can adapt to the first team, and where we need to concentrate the summer spending.
I can't see Pep coming in and accepting others picking the team or players for him -or will he, is this the way they worked at Barca ?
So right now, (and I am not calling Pellers because whatever the situation the results are still our best under a single coach (not manager)) who is rubber stamping team selection, and on what basis is the team being selected.
Whatever it is, today aside, most agree that the way we are shuffling round to cover injuries is not producing our best football and results.