scorer said:
TBH I certainly don't take your disagreeing with me personally, i quite enjoy the debate.
I do understand how wickepedia works and realise it is opinion... just like this forum. As for evidence his success as a coach, IMO speaks for itself.
To answer Clubbers point, I understand Rijkaard had to have an enforced vacation for 12/18 months on accounf=t of the fact he was having some taxation problems which meant he would be hammered if he went back to work (I don't know if this is factual nor do I have and information about the Italian revenue so i cannot back this up).
Just chill man. i want Rijkaard, you dont. I'd gladly take Hiddink or Jose (who wouldn't?) but I firmly believe Rijkaard could be a realistic option.
Remind me... who would you like?
If Hiddink of Jose rocked up, i really couldn't complain. I think they'd be given much more time and leeway (sp?) too which would make everything much easier and the ride much more bearable.
As a mentioned though, the people who are saying "Jose" are the same who are starting threads saying our players aren't ggod enough; Robinho should fuck off, Ade is lazy, SWP is shite etc etc We'll finish mid table. What i don't get is how these same people think that Jose; The best manager in the world (TM) is a viable option? Is it purely based on our money?