Bahahaha!!! If you have Twitter mate, she might appreciate hearing that reply. Everyone loves a good joke.Why? Should we get rid of them?
True about Chelsea being red hot favourites (City missed their chance of winning the title by not beating Chelsea in the home game a couple of weeks before).Thanks for the reply Kev
I take your word about what you did and didn't hear but you must have plugged into different media outlets than I did. I've become a big fan of the women's game as a whole and, as such, consume a lot of relevant output from mainstream and fan based sources. Among many others, I follow the channel 'Sarah & Sara' produced by a couple of Americans who seem to be as focused on the players' personal lives as they are on the football. Even they spoke of City's chances and, for the sake of Rose and Sam, they hoped City would make it.
Now, to be fair, I didn't come across anyone who actually thought Manchester City would overturn Chelsea's lead because everyone was convinced that Chelsea would beat Reading. Every media that I read, watched, or listened to did discuss the possibility of a City triumph however. I don't see how any report could have done otherwise.
That is fantastic but will our innovation be lauded i doubt it, but it will improve the lives and performance of women in sport . Great newsInnovating once again it seems:
Research collaboration on menstruation affecting the female athlete (BBC link)
Khadija could be a great signing and she grew up as a Ciyy fan. She might give Kenton a run for his money as Jamaica’s number 1 City fan
It's good for their game but I had BT sport anyway lolUefa signs Women’s Champions League free live streaming deal with Dazn | Women's Champions League | The Guardian
amp-theguardian-com.cdn.ampproject.org