You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
World Cup thread - Sunday 15th June
- Thread starter Prestwich_Blue
- Start date
M
M
mat
Guest
Blatter would never use a superior English product.ShaLaLaLaSummerbee said:i agree. The technology is not as good as that used in the Premquiet_riot said:to me, the CGI ball looked much further over the line than the real ball appeared to be on the replay
BucksBlue
Well-Known Member
The technology is suspect. Watching the replay I am yet to be convinced that all the ball was over the line.RandomJ said:BigOscar said:I know it hit the keeper and went back towards the net, but the replay from level with the posts didn't look over the line at all.RandomJ said:Course it went in. The replay from the other side showed the keeper knocked it in before dragging it back out.
The technology is tested thoroughly before being used if it says all the ball crossed then all the ball crossed. The replay shows the whole ball crossed just with the naked eye.
ShaLaLaLaSummerbee said:The technology is suspect. Watching the replay I am yet to be convinced that all the ball was over the line.RandomJ said:BigOscar said:I know it hit the keeper and went back towards the net, but the replay from level with the posts didn't look over the line at all.
The technology is tested thoroughly before being used if it says all the ball crossed then all the ball crossed. The replay shows the whole ball crossed just with the naked eye.
Just look at the picture I posted on the previous page it's a goal. There is no debate to be had. The only issue was the way they replayed the decision showing both no goal then goal.
prestonibbo_mcfc
Well-Known Member
He's still on about that "controversial" goal.
M
M
mat
Guest
FIFA would never use dodgy technology to suit their agenda....ShaLaLaLaSummerbee said:The technology is suspect. Watching the replay I am yet to be convinced that all the ball was over the line.RandomJ said:BigOscar said:I know it hit the keeper and went back towards the net, but the replay from level with the posts didn't look over the line at all.
The technology is tested thoroughly before being used if it says all the ball crossed then all the ball crossed. The replay shows the whole ball crossed just with the naked eye.
Gaylord du Bois
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 29,259
- Location
- Great Umbrage.
- Team supported
- Glory Hunting Blue. Was Chelsea.
Like honesty?mat said:Blatter would never use a superior English product.ShaLaLaLaSummerbee said:i agree. The technology is not as good as that used in the Premquiet_riot said:to me, the CGI ball looked much further over the line than the real ball appeared to be on the replay
RandomJ said:ShaLaLaLaSummerbee said:The technology is suspect. Watching the replay I am yet to be convinced that all the ball was over the line.RandomJ said:The technology is tested thoroughly before being used if it says all the ball crossed then all the ball crossed. The replay shows the whole ball crossed just with the naked eye.
Just look at the picture I posted on the previous page it's a goal. There is no debate to be had. The only issue was the way they replayed the decision showing both no goal then goal.
Agreed, there is no debate as the technology is sound.
jimharri
Moderator
Dog with a bone.prestonibbo_mcfc said:He's still on about that "controversial" goal.