spacecadet
Well-Known Member
I have seen since 73/4 only therefs are keeping them up there- fuckin shite.
Damocles said:Ifs, buts and maybes are useless.
United had a bad game today, probably their worst of the season and still won 3-1.
United have a midfield of Giggs, Gibson, Fletcher and Valencia, we have a midfield of Robinho, Ireland, Barry and SWP, and they are still miles ahead of us in the league.
It's easy to point that they have less names than they did, but as long as they keep doing what they are doing, they will be Champions again, despite having a shit team.
I never understand people's fascination with running the rags down. What exactly does this prove?
Let's say we all agree that United are utterly shit, and that the club is falling apart. What happens when we beat them? Do you celebrate beating a team that you described as garbage? What happens if they beat us? What does that say about US?
Let's say we all agree that United are a good team, and then we beat them. Then we've beaten a tough team, and means much more. This is why managers don't say "yeah, we'll hammer them, they're shit" pre-match.
Besides, being a City fan doesn't mean that you have to stick your head in the sand and ignore the rest of the footballing world. Nobody is particularly good this season, including us. You can call United shit, Chelsea shit and Arsenal shit. But the fact remains that one of them will win the league, and we won't.
Timbobs said:The strongest thing against this United squad you can say is this, you can see any team getting points against them. This is something most rag fans aren't used to.
Damocles said:This is the attitude I'm talking about.
Your logic is just flawed.
City don't like United.
Person expressed an opinion not entirely negative about United.
Person doesn't like City.
It's just the most infuriatingly stupid thing on this forum.
I don't even know what the last thing means. What's a waller? I don't build walls, but I am a programmer.