Would You Have Bullard ?

[MadchesterCity]

He played well against us but not the player that i would want to sign for City

His banter is quite good on Soccer AM - but that doesn't mean we should want to sign him!

Unless of course we the groundsman are having issues with crows - then he would be first pick every week!

 

[the hooded buttock]

he's good but the idea of signing him, given other options, is ludicrous

 

[Biamp]

No way.

 

[Freddan77]

.. of course not !

 

[libertineg]

you lot must be fuckin mad jimmy bullard could not lace mj boots if you lot think we need him its a good job you aint running the club cause the direction you are wanting is not the way we need to gowhy did one of the best managers in the prem get rid of him i think fulham are doing quite well without terry horlock

Couldn't lace Mj's boots?! What are you going off to come up with that daft conclusion? Both have injury problems, so we'll leave that one out. Bullard has been a consistently good performer in the Premier League for 5 years at least.....MJ has had one good season?!!....sorry mate, have a think about it, there is no comparison

 

[gagiesotherhalf]

5 years ago, perhaps.
Not now, thank you.

 

[bell_mcfc]

Id love to see him in city shirt because hes a true legend, but to be realistic couldnt make team so no point.

 

[NICKS BACK]

Anyway he is injury prone.

Someone said it was encouraging that at least it was his other knee?

But Hughes will probably sign him anyway.

 

[alera]

Would I fuck hes a cripple apart from anything !

 

[city51]

NO