Would you report your neighbour

[aguero93:20]

I have shagged a granny and a rag, and I liked it!

*sniff*

 

[Lovebitesandeveryfing]

I have shagged a granny and a rag, and I liked it!

Isn't that the name of a catchy song or something?

 

[snorky]

Isn't that the name of a catchy song or something?

Hey Ya!

 

[snorky]

*sniff*

Pervert

 

[aguero93:20]

Pervert

You're that too

 

[Brightwell’s left peg]

I haven’t read all of the debate/pages in this, and I expect the question has already been asked, but surely it boils down to this simple consideration;

Do they support the rags?

I’d have thought the opportunity to remove any rag from the general population should be taken, for the greater good, irrespective.

 

[aguero93:20]

I haven’t read all of the debate/pages in this, and I expect the question has already been asked, but surely it boils down to this simple consideration;

Do they support the rags?

I’d have thought the opportunity to remove any rag from the general population should be taken, for the greater good, irrespective.

I'll refer you to the following post;

Think carefully. Enforcing child poverty can seem like a good idea, I agree. But it's important to remember economic truths. First, that childhood poverty has life long debilitating effects.

The second economic truth is that of "Opportunity cost". Ask yourself, would dobbing this girl in cost you the opportunity to make more children more poor? After all, one should aim for the maximum return on the investment of your time and idle jealousy. In this case, that would be inflicting the most human misery and harm possible.

That suggests there is some other, greater evil that you could serve here. Could you not simply "accidentally" infect them with a nasty infectious disease that had long term debilitating consequences? Or perhaps traumatise them psychologically. Remember to escape from being held to account for your actions by employing a devious strategy of manipulation and 'gaslighting'.

It would be a shame to throw away an opportunity to rid society of multiple rags just to get rid of only one.

 

[yeseye]

I'll refer you to the following post;

It would be a shame to throw away an opportunity to rid society of multiple rags just to get rid of only one.

 

[aguero93:20]

View attachment 72463

That's the tour guide at the Swamp isn't it?

 

[Deleted member 77198]

I can see why people get more pissed off with a local benefits fraudster than the likes of Starbucks who don’t pay any tax in Britain.

Howard Schultz doesn’t live next door to you whereas the benefits cheat does so you see someone taking the piss and barely lifting a finger to rake in the money from the govt when you’re grafting like fuck just to get by, and you’re reminded of it every day when you leave for work and come home from work as they’ve had their feet up the whole time you’ve been on your feet doing a day’s work - you’re going to be more pissed off with that next door neighbour than the likes of Schultz.

But you’d have to be sure you know they’re doing wrong. Don’t be getting the authorities on someone when they’re actually working from home on something like selling sex toys and underwear online, which they wouldn’t want to broadcast to neighbours as their main source of income.

Even then, if the authorities were doing their jobs properly, they’d catch them anyway so you wouldn’t need to grass them up.