FogBlueInSanFran
Well-Known Member
I respectfully can't understand what he types sometimes. Any time after 5 PM Eastern his posts start to wobble in a consistent, familiar way. I hope he gets the help he needs.I respectfully disagree
I respectfully can't understand what he types sometimes. Any time after 5 PM Eastern his posts start to wobble in a consistent, familiar way. I hope he gets the help he needs.I respectfully disagree
First game of the new season or the latest game of this season? Our last game in the prem was less than 4 weeks ago our next prem game is light years away by comparison.OH MY GOD!!!! This place gets worse! It was a first game of the season with no where near our preferred first XI. Fucking half whit idiots on here. Think it’s time to bin this place off. Very difficult to have a half intelligent conversation or reasonable onsite into anything City anymore.
But looking at a rulebook wouldn't change the fact he WON the ball..he wasn't reckless or using excessive force..the impact was because the other player also slid in.. if anything sliding in and not winning the ball is more reckless .. it was unfortunate that the player was caught but it happens in contact sports..I think we will just have to disagree on the red card mateOK, the fact he won the ball doesn't automatically mean no fowl! The key factor is whether the challenge is considered careless, reckless, or involves excessive force, endangering the opponent.
If they are City fans?Fucking hated the undeserved shite Edghill got, likewise with Rico now. City fans can sometimes be the biggest dickheads going.
Perfect summationWe were never going to learn an awful lot from this game tbh. They were actually better than I expected though. Moved the ball quick, had bags of pace and created a good few openings without the killer touch you’d expect from a better side.
I get that some expected a massive and convincing thrashing after the hype of the new signing but that was never going to be the case was it.
Pre season vibes from us. New players, new ideas, and some of the same shortcomings coming through over the 90 minutes.
Positives were Reijnders who was brilliant first half, Phil started well and could’ve got 2, Doku looked dangerous and I thought Savinho looked good first half.
Second half we looked more solid at the expensive of taking out the creativity. I’m sure Pep will get the balance more refined as time goes on.
Cherki was poor but wouldn’t read too much into it. Playing his first game away from Lyon in his entire senior career, debut for us, bound to be nervous at 21. Looked like he was trying too hard at times. He’ll come good.
Thought Rico was fine despite the red which was harsh, but still didn’t show enough to give me confidence he can be a mainstay at right back. We seriously need one.
Looking forward to seeing a more balanced starting 11 as the tournament goes on
I don’t know what your point isFirst game of the new season or the latest game of this season? Our last game in the prem was less than 4 weeks ago our next prem game is light years away by comparison.
Fuck me - someone with a brainWe were never going to learn an awful lot from this game tbh. They were actually better than I expected though. Moved the ball quick, had bags of pace and created a good few openings without the killer touch you’d expect from a better side.
I get that some expected a massive and convincing thrashing after the hype of the new signing but that was never going to be the case was it.
Pre season vibes from us. New players, new ideas, and some of the same shortcomings coming through over the 90 minutes.
Positives were Reijnders who was brilliant first half, Phil started well and could’ve got 2, Doku looked dangerous and I thought Savinho looked good first half.
Second half we looked more solid at the expensive of taking out the creativity. I’m sure Pep will get the balance more refined as time goes on.
Cherki was poor but wouldn’t read too much into it. Playing his first game away from Lyon in his entire senior career, debut for us, bound to be nervous at 21. Looked like he was trying too hard at times. He’ll come good.
Thought Rico was fine despite the red which was harsh, but still didn’t show enough to give me confidence he can be a mainstay at right back. We seriously need one.
Looking forward to seeing a more balanced starting 11 as the tournament goes on
Fml , Rico may well not be of the standard required , but the amount if times your bringing him up makes me think he's shagged your wifeRef did us all a favour with that one. City fan?
He’s 100% not got what it takes to start regularly at fullback for us but it’s not his fault he keeps being asked toFucking hated the undeserved shite Edghill got, likewise with Rico now. City fans can sometimes be the biggest dickheads going.
Must admit I’ve largely been staying away from the football forums and just a few posts read and wondering why I should bother.OH MY GOD!!!! This place gets worse! It was a first game of the season with no where near our preferred first XI. Fucking half whit idiots on here. Think it’s time to bin this place off. Very difficult to have a half intelligent conversation or reasonable onsite into anything City anymore.
It was a pedantic one to say today's game forms part of the 24/25 season as opposed to the 25/26 season as it's timing is much closer to last season.I don’t know what your point is
He is obviously biased. That’s why. He has no place being a pundit on a rival English team’s game. Can’t believe I really need to articulate this. You might know his allegiance, but you know how when politicians appear on tv and their name appears with their party? Well he needs that. If they did that, less of an issue (but still an issue).I don't see the issue. We all know he's a Chelsea man. Why pretend otherwise? Loads of other pundits do it and i respect that far more than somebody pretending they don't have allegiances, most pundits are employed precisely because of their allegiances.
He's one of their regular pundits for this tournament, why wouldn't he be on our game?
lol ok thanks for that haha. Very useful ;)It was a pedantic one to say today's game forms part of the 24/25 season as opposed to the 25/26 season as it's timing is much closer to last season.
So now your changing your argument, originally you stated just that he won the ball and therefore no fowl. Now your claiming it wasn't reckless which is a subjective argument.But looking at a rulebook wouldn't change the fact he WON the ball..he wasn't reckless or using excessive force..the impact was because the other player also slid in.. if anything sliding in and not winning the ball is more reckless .. it was unfortunate that the player was caught but it happens in contact sports..I think we will just have to disagree on the red card mate