Yehhhh, so what's your point Wenger?

adrianr said:
daveiw1976 said:
The Flash said:
He is a whingeing two-faced c**t and should take his moaning vagina-like face for a fucking shit.

The c**t.
Click to expand...

Vagina like face? I can only assume you've met some interesting women...
Click to expand...

For some reason I left this post on my other screen as the head of my department just sat down to look at something on my computer. Needless to say he's fairly perplexed what sort of forum this is.
Click to expand...

*The Flash likes this*
 
BigOscar said:
I truly don't understand anyones confusion over the Lampard loan? He joined a club who don't play for 6 months, so they've loaned him out to stay fit. We are paying his wages, just like anyone else would for any of the thousands of other loans going on in the world of football, so where lies the problem? I guess some people just like getting upset, Wenger being high on that list.
Click to expand...

the problem is 2 fold.

1, we were already better than arsenal before we signed frank.

2, its manchester city.
 
The man truly is a dinosaur .
I hope he stays at arse forever. As long as he's there they can look forward to winning one cup every 10 years or so!
He is wasting time and money there , long may it continue.
 
1BUimXW.gif
 
The point dear Arsene is making is that Frank has got us a point and kickstarted the tie v Wednesday. It is this that he doesn't like. Had we lost to CFC and Wednesday had nicked it, he wouldn't have made a muff! He fully understands the loan system 'cos he's the Prof, ain't he? Beaucoup de citrons, Arsene!
 
He was asked about it. It's not like he organised a speech.

And I tend to agree with him. I would feel uncomfortable about us taking Lampard for the rest of the season. That was the question he was asked.

To me, it's just the press trying to stir shit for headlines (surprise). At most Lampard will stay with us until early February
 
ElanJo said:
He was asked about it. It's not like he organised a speech.

And I tend to agree with him. I would feel uncomfortable about us taking Lampard for the rest of the season. That was the question he was asked.

To me, it's just the press trying to stir shit for headlines (surprise). At most Lampard will stay with us until early February
Click to expand...
He could have said it was between City , NYCFC, and the player himself and nothing to do with him.
 
Bodicoteblue said:
ElanJo said:
He was asked about it. It's not like he organised a speech.

And I tend to agree with him. I would feel uncomfortable about us taking Lampard for the rest of the season. That was the question he was asked.

To me, it's just the press trying to stir shit for headlines (surprise). At most Lampard will stay with us until early February
Click to expand...
He could have said it was between City , NYCFC, and the player himself and nothing to do with him.
Click to expand...

Bingo!
 
Bodicoteblue said:
ElanJo said:
He was asked about it. It's not like he organised a speech.

And I tend to agree with him. I would feel uncomfortable about us taking Lampard for the rest of the season. That was the question he was asked.

To me, it's just the press trying to stir shit for headlines (surprise). At most Lampard will stay with us until early February
Click to expand...
He could have said it was between City , NYCFC, and the player himself and nothing to do with him.
Click to expand...


Exactly.
 
ElanJo said:
He was asked about it. It's not like he organised a speech.

And I tend to agree with him. I would feel uncomfortable about us taking Lampard for the rest of the season. That was the question he was asked.

To me, it's just the press trying to stir shit for headlines (surprise). At most Lampard will stay with us until early February
Click to expand...

Don't be so fucking daft. The stupid twat should just fuck off.

Lampard was released on a free so we could have just signed him direct if we wanted to, just don't get why he thinks there is anything untoward - it's not like NYCFC signed him for £100mil and loaned him to us free????? - then I'd understand the tosspot having a moan.
 
ElanJo said:
He was asked about it. It's not like he organised a speech.

And I tend to agree with him. I would feel uncomfortable about us taking Lampard for the rest of the season. That was the question he was asked.

To me, it's just the press trying to stir shit for headlines (surprise). At most Lampard will stay with us until early February
Click to expand...

I wouldn't feel uncomfortable at all !!!

Bring it on !

i do not feel any need to factor Arsehole Whinger's bleatings into my assessment of us as a club

The man is an arch , opportunist hypocrite.. and probably most bitter that , not only have we squeezed his club down the league with better PL performances and that we have spent wisely , where until last summer he was in denial about transfer policies

... worst of all , we have taken players from his club that he had undervalued , and made them stars

Alors , c'est dur, la vie, Arse.... NTM !!
 
So Arse are playing their arch rivals in the first north London derby of the season, but the southern-based press and whinger deem the most important subject, Manchester City and Lampard.
Yes course they're not obsessed!
 
Pubteam Lomas said:
So Arse are playing their arch rivals in the first north London derby of the season, but the southern-based press and whinger deem the most important subject, Manchester City and Lampard.
Yes course they're not obsessed!
Click to expand...

LOL ... this is it...

What a sad tw@t Whinger is
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top