PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Exeter Blue I am here]

He is not a presenter anymore. GB News unlike msm generally presents both sides of an issue but if you prefer to be fed news rather than form your own opinion carry on with BBC & Sly.

Some of the finest wummery I’ve seen in years!

 

[Blue_Lightsaber]

GB News unlike msm generally presents both sides of an issue

That's loony bin talk.

I prefer chatting with City fans, not loony bins.

 

[HelloCity]

He is not a presenter anymore. GB News unlike msm generally presents both sides of an issue but if you prefer to be fed news rather than form your own opinion carry on with BBC & Sly.

Disturbing.

(But hopefully a Clarkie)

 

[Exeter Blue I am here]

Never give a sucker an even break. They hit us hard, so we should smack em back even harder.

Don King if I’m not much mistaken. One of his pithier remarks!

 

[At-Swim-Two-Birds]

Some of the finest wummery I’ve seen in years!

I hope you are right. Personally I think he is parading his room temperature IQ to the world.

 

[Gaylord du Bois]

If we’ve provided irrefutable evidence how can we have not co-operated?

To the IC not the premier league. The premier league might probably try and take the eufa/cas finding against us on that point.
Who knows?
After all we're all throwing balls of thought in the air. Hopefully they'll bounce in our favour.

 

[waspish]

Don't misunderstand me, I also think we will be cleared of the vast majority of the charges, I just think the idea that we have already sent documents that have put the whole thing to bed to be incredibly unlikely. We will prove our innocence at a trial.

They have to go through ALL the accounting documents there ain't few a4 papers they can read to find out if we innocent or guilty and why it is taking ages!

 

[Gaylord du Bois]

Yes, that alone (if the case) has reputational damage value doesn’t it?

Fucking right it does. Case closed.

 

[bumbleblue]

To the IC not the premier league. The premier league might probably try and take the eufa/cas finding against us on that point.
Who knows?
After all we're all throwing balls of thought in the air. Hopefully they'll bounce in our favour.

That’s what I think - it’s all balls.

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

Surely that would have happened months ago, if we actually had the irrefutable evidence we claim.

If this turns out to be true I will be embarrassed as anyone and I will personally apologise to Prestige. But I'm not going to start writing my apology letter yet.

I can't imagine that the IC is sitting there waiting for the hearing to start before they look at the evidence presented by both sides. It's far more likely that the hearing will involve a summary of the evidence and clarification questions to witnesses from both parties.

I imagine they'll have been going through a pile of documents and the hearing will start when they've done that. Hence why they could well be in a position to question the strength of the PL's case in the face of the evidence we provided.