Search results

Regardless of what transpires I'm happy to confirm that

Not at all I don't have a problem with City I admire the style of football you play and happy to concede that you are favourites for the title However I do have a problem with moronic posters who are incapable of making any contribution other than puerile abuse

That's your analysis not mine

Look my analysis is this: Wenger has 2 years left to cement his legacy. He wants to win the title. He is not going to strengthen City whilst weakening Arsenal that's just lunacy, If Sanchez goes it will be to a Bayern or PSG. And Sanchez goes nowhere until we get another marquee signing Got it?

We might be weaker but you'll not be stronger

I don't see that. If he goes to Bayern, it means City are not stronger by having him.

Wenger won't take the EL seriously, like the League Cup, he will play the kids and focus solely on the title

No

That's a bit ungracious

I'm sure that Elsie from Crouch End...

Your response betrays nothing but your bias and insofar it has any merit is in confirming you have limited experience.

I see no merit in answering hypothetical questions. I have already made my position clear on the matter.

You, Sir, can't tell the difference between sarcasm and pomposity and your response betrays fully the latter without any of the humorous intent of the former.

With no adequate replacement, what's the alternative?

Looks like Sanchez is staying then

1) I'm sure Wenger won't lose sleep on failing to get your approbation. 2) Likely not but he'll need a couple of marquee players to counter the downsides of selling Sanchez. I'm not as sold on Mahrez as you but he's a quality player. If we fail to sign a top class replacement, Sanchez stays. 3)...

Didn't say we would sign Mbappe, just saying we would only let Sanchez go in the event we sign a marquee player like him.

All season ticket renewals had to be made by 1st June, so hardly relevant.

If he leaves on his existing contract he won't get the offered pay rise, so we save paying his higher wages for a year mitigating the effect of selling him now

You should re-read my post. I didn't leave out the possibility of confirmation bias in my analysis.