fallowfieldflyer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 428
What would you expect to get (roughly) over the season if you put £100 on City to WIN every home game in the season.Just a thought.
des hardi said:wrong forum,just a thought! ;)
sjk2008 said:If you were to win all 18 home games next season, then hypothetically stick United, Arsenal & Chelsea at 1/2, Spuds & Liverpool at 1/3 then the rest at say 1/5, you'd win:
£100 x3 @ 1/2 means £50 x3 winnings = £150 (+£300 stake back)
£100 x2 @ 1/3 means £33 x2 winnings = £66 (+£200 stake back)
£100 x13 @ 1/5 means £20 x13 winnings = £260 (+£1300 stake back)
You're overall winnings would be around £470. Not that much when you consider you have staked £1800 on over the season. Then again, the likeliness of City failing to win on 4 occasions at home isn't high, so if you have the cash, it might not be too bad an idea.
I wouldn't do it though.
Edit - Didn't think you meant putting accumulative winnings on each match. Obviously the potential winnings that way is much higher, however the potential loss would be equally disappointing.
sjk2008 said:If you were to win all 18 home games next season, then hypothetically stick United, Arsenal & Chelsea at 1/2, Spuds & Liverpool at 1/3 then the rest at say 1/5, you'd win:
£100 x3 @ 1/2 means £50 x3 winnings = £150 (+£300 stake back)
£100 x2 @ 1/3 means £33 x2 winnings = £66 (+£200 stake back)
£100 x13 @ 1/5 means £20 x13 winnings = £260 (+£1300 stake back)
You're overall winnings would be around £470. Not that much when you consider you have staked £1800 on over the season. Then again, the likeliness of City failing to win on 4 occasions at home isn't high, so if you have the cash, it might not be too bad an idea.
I wouldn't do it though.
Edit - Didn't think you meant putting accumulative winnings on each match. Obviously the potential winnings that way is much higher, however the potential loss would be equally disappointing.
Damocles said:What are the odds for City to not drop a single point at home next year?
19 straight winners can't be bad odds, surely?
I'm crap at betting. Which is dodgy considering that I built a betting site a few years back.