I tend not to think about the past too often as the present and the future are so bright.
Hughes was an alright manager but not good enough for where we were going basically. He is more suited to teams lacking financial backing where he can be perceived as over achieving rather than matching the expectations of senior people within the club.
Mancini is a step up in class tactically. He ensured we didn't conceed as many goals defensively and then concentrated on the attack in a methodical fashion and then implimented his tactics and playing style. He earned a standard of respect in the press that Hughes lacked prior. He worked better under pressure than Hughes ever would and he achieved results that Hughes weren't capable of at the end of the day.
There is no comparison in terms of credentials and I'm just thankful of where we are today in terms of personnel and as a club in general.
Hughes was an alright manager but not good enough for where we were going basically. He is more suited to teams lacking financial backing where he can be perceived as over achieving rather than matching the expectations of senior people within the club.
Mancini is a step up in class tactically. He ensured we didn't conceed as many goals defensively and then concentrated on the attack in a methodical fashion and then implimented his tactics and playing style. He earned a standard of respect in the press that Hughes lacked prior. He worked better under pressure than Hughes ever would and he achieved results that Hughes weren't capable of at the end of the day.
There is no comparison in terms of credentials and I'm just thankful of where we are today in terms of personnel and as a club in general.