oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
Outweighed only because too many have a negative opinion of MOTD full stop.Yes, I know what the BBC showed, and I don't think it was accurate or fair.
The coverage on our website was precisely what the BBC should have delivered.
All entitled to an opinion Oakie and I respect yours, but your being massively outweighed with this one.
I`m trying to look at it more objectively ie. what else could they have shown in that first half ? Total possession with virtually no end product or goal mouth incidents that we had very little off,but Sunderland did.
MOTD wasn`t produced solely for City fans mate.
So when you say it wasn`t accurate how would you have edited it in that first half (thats all I`m discussing and have been all through this thread) ? You can`t deny that Sunderland had more attempts and more incidents in our penalty area than we did in theirs.
The second half they showed was nothing but City.Just think that in a 5 minute showing of that first half the editing wasn`t anywhere near as bad as some suggest ... irrespective of how much possession we had.