PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

The Fat el Hombre said:
Remember him absolutely creaming his kecks at the thought of a qatar takeover at old Trafford? He did a daily heil article which had a runway next to the swamp. Now they've got brexit jim begging for tax payers money to sort the leaks!
Click to expand...
I mean he was clearly just being briefed by the Qatari side and acting like their PR man.
 
First of all, I love Tolmie’s tweets and posts and I always want to believe that they are true. He’s not always been correct and I can understand the scepticism surrounding the latest update on the PL investigation but there is more than one piece of public information available that corroborates the current stance.

Goldbridge’s change of direction is a hint, Jordan’s change of direction is another one but for me the kicker that brings more than a shred of credibility to all this is the comment made by Alberto Galassi, a board member at Manchester City since 2012 who stated along the lines of (excuse me if I don’t get this word for word) “I am not allowed to comment but you can tell by my body language that I am supremely confident about the outcome”.

Galassi is an attorney at law specialising in international commerce and arbitration.

I for one am quite confident that these cease and desist warnings are genuine and as Tolmie stated, the club are doing this from a position of strength.
 
Can I just say we were saying leaks from premier league uefa or whoever were showing they couldn’t be trusted and weren’t able to hold their piss or mischief making,last couple of weeks we have had people purportedly with inside information ( leaks )from City so what’s the difference ..think I’ll hold fire until the club itself comes and says something..
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
I'm confident about my information that the PL want some sort of settlement.

@gordondaviesmoustache has talked about the use of the phrase "...will be resolved..." alluding to a settlement rather than going full speed ahead with a hearing based on a weak case.

Alberto Galassi's interview also suggests that the club feels it's on the verge of a successful outcome.

And I've always been confident and maintained these alleged breaches are very weak, and have either been rejected by CAS or considered not worth bothering with by UEFA.

It's also possible that the IC has come to the conclusion that these breaches aren't considered fraudulent and therefore outside the statutory 6- year limit under UK law.
Click to expand...

1000000951.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.