halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 9,695
....but but but, they past the PL 'right and proper' owners test !!But but but Chelsea sold the hotel to themselves, in effect.
The Daily Mail Nazi-supporting paper had the clearest breakdown online of the infamous 115 yesterday. As City approach Real tonight, Chelsea at the weekend and crucial league games, expect more breaking news segments across all the detritus newspapers and their social media sheep.
Ooh the JB hand shuffling is doing my noggin in. They love him, don't they?! Beeb also comparing JB to Foden. Hopefully one of our own will stand out tonight and the paper websites can go back to their 115 agenda. Surprised they don't have advertising banners for Ar$3nal and LiVARpool.I’ve noticed the article seems to sit on their main news page and has done for the last few days since City went top of the league. Go into their sports pages and there is not one article about City playing Madrid tonight. There is one about Jude Bellingham though.
I have said on a few occasions that targets drive behaviour and the reality is people like Bohley will be 100% aware of what the rules will say and he will almost certainly have had very clever people looking at the rules as written and see where there are “ holes”My interpretation is chelsea appear to have complied with guidelines. Guidelines not fit for purpose. Not sure what that purpose is tho
And how snubbing City was the obviously correct decision.I’ve noticed the article seems to sit on their main news page and has done for the last few days since City went top of the league. Go into their sports pages and there is not one article about City playing Madrid tonight. There is one about Jude Bellingham though.
It’s far from as simple as thatListing to talksprt apparently in the rules once you sell a property like Chelsea's did the premier had on it within 10 days of the sale! Seeing as it hasn't means they know it's dodgy when they did it 6 months ago
It’s far from as simple as that
The sale took place circa 10 months ago the league will have had all sorts of submissions made one of which will have been the supply of future financial information in that information details of how any gap showing up under T or T+1 in PSR submissions would have been detailed. Had the PL not been happy with Chelsea’s submissions then they would have applied other requirements just as they did with Everton.
Stephan in the TS segment was understandably making a significant of assumptions but without inside knowledge most of those assumptions are simply guesswork
Strange isn't it? How all these things are so secretive?
The PL should publish every clubs PSR calculation when they are accepted/challenged so everybody knows where everybody is. What are the reasons for secrecy on the PSR numbers?