He wouldn't be asking the lino if he's off If you listen to audio that has been published the lino will say E.G. "Grealish off I'm letting it go" It's almost like a commentary of what they are seeing So, at the end of the phase of play, if it qualifies to be looked at, VAR will know to check straight awayWell you state that with hindsight of audio Liverpool was an error as was yesterday
Clearly yesterday was an error how do you not know on audio he’s saying to the linemen - was he off I thought he was shit I blew too early
Why would the ref be corrupt come on
i dont know about free kick bit sounds tad exaggeratedThere was no chance that Grealish would have been allowed to score anyway - the defender would hacked have him down, got sent off for the last 30 seconds of the match and City would have had a free kick 25 yards further up the pitch than the one that we did get.
Yes. Referees normally wait a few seconds to make their decision. A few seconds is all it needs to see how a situation is developing. Then the decision is made. It is either play on, advantage, or award a foul.Are you saying that you've never seen a ref play advantage, then bring play back for the original foul, when no advantage occurs?
That must happen in nearly every game of football I've ever watched.
That decision has already been explained and VAR couldn't determine with 4 different angles if it was a handball This season it would have been a clear Not Handball as the law changed When looking at it Everton didn't gain any disadvantage it didn't stop a goal Rodri wasn't being challenged There was also talk that there was a possible offside that would have been looked at if VAR determined he had committed an offenceReally - Everton away Rodri penalty
You're definitely wrong.Yes. Referees normally wait a few seconds to make their decision. A few seconds is so it needs to see how a situation is developing. Then the decision is made. It is either play on, advantage, or award a foul.
You don't see a referee signalling advantage, then going back to award the free kick. I might be wrong.
It happened yesterday in the first half, when he played advantage to City but it clearly wasn't after a few seconds and players and crowd indicating they wanted a freekick Not sure if he indicated thoughYes. Referees normally wait a few seconds to make their decision. A few seconds is so it needs to see how a situation is developing. Then the decision is made. It is either play on, advantage, or award a foul.
You don't see a referee signalling advantage, then going back to award the free kick. I might be wrong.
I am a referee. You could if Grealish wasn’t getting the ball but Grealish through in goal. That’s why like Jermaine Jenas said it was a ‘monster of a mistake’. I say replay the gameYes. Referees normally wait a few seconds to make their decision. A few seconds is so it needs to see how a situation is developing. Then the decision is made. It is either play on, advantage, or award a foul.
You don't see a referee signalling advantage, then going back to award the free kick. I might be wrong.
They have said they consider it human error and that he'll ref his next scheduled game as normal.Why did PGMOL almost instantly make a statement on human error for the Liverpool incident put are nowhere to be seen today?