This doesn't explain the Ragchester Evening Bollox though. Years ago it was pretty much a 50/50 split when Paul Hince and David Meek were the City and Rag reporters respectively. Now it's 70/30 at best in favour if them.This is 100% true, the late Brian Woolnough sent me an email after I ranted at an article he wrote basically saying that they sell more papers if the story is topical and panders for their main demographic of rags, chavs, scousers and gooners.
It's not personal just business, doesn't sit right with me but I understand it now.
And you get these figures from where ???This doesn't explain the Ragchester Evening Bollox though. Years ago it was pretty much a 50/50 split when Paul Hince and David Meek were the City and Rag reporters respectively. Now it's 70/30 at best in favour if them.
I think there is a fair bit of filtering when it comes to radio phone in's also. 5Live have more Chelski/Dippers/Arse/Rags fans on than any other teams, even when they haven't played.
I kind of agree when we were in the lower tiers of football it was fairer than it is today def biased in favour of the verminAnd you get these figures from where ???
We get a load of good write ups in the MEN.Unfortunately for some they hate the fact that the Rag fans say exactly the same about us,that we get better coverage.Swings and roundabouts.I kind of agree when we were in the lower tiers of football it was fairer than it is today def biased in favour of the vermin
You only have to look at their website and other social media feeds.And you get these figures from where ???
Well I see very little on there that causes concern.Its only there if you want to find something.You only have to look at their website and other social media feeds.
Also, the amount of negative and s**t stirring articles about City they publish is disproportionate compared to the Rags.
Well if that's how the bookies rate us, let's pester them to offer fair value odds instead of the paltry odds that they always come up with, even when we are away to one of the media's favoured Leviathans. Let them show their true feelings through their satchels.See even the bloke they ring from Coral Bookies is in on the act now – asking him about odds this morning, they got talking about our game v the Hammers on friday – he said they were good till we got a very 'dubious' penalty, and he felt for them... then when later talking about the Rags you could almost hear him knocking one out, such was his excitement!
Just seen this on another thread;Well I see very little on there that causes concern.Its only there if you want to find something.
SB has been excellent over the years since he was ousted by Purple Nose,for daring to speak negatively ref the takeover all those years ago.He isn`t frightened of saying it how it is ref any City negatives,but he asks questions like many fans do on here.He fights our corner regularly,especially against UEFA and the FA and nice to see him having a spat at the moment on Twitter with Shearer,asking him why he hasn`t had the balls to come out and slate Liverpool off,for playing 10 different players in their FA Cup game yesterday.He slagged City off last year for the team MP put out,a a couple of days before an important CL game.Just seen this on another thread;
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co...ews/man-city-media-criticism-shearer-12425106
Makes a refreshing change to be honest..... Mind you, Stuart Brennan isn't too bad.
I don't know who runs their Twitter feeds, but the City feed is nothing but Click-bait. I've stopped following it now.