Saddleworth2
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Jan 2014
- Messages
- 20,614
I got it from the guy that said Sanchez was nailed on by tea-time, 110%.I reckon he’s a tax accountant!!
I got it from the guy that said Sanchez was nailed on by tea-time, 110%.I reckon he’s a tax accountant!!
I’m 200% certain he didn’t say that....I got it from the guy that said Sanchez was nailed on by tea-time, 110%.
Oh right, let's not bother then. You've convinced me.
To answer your previous question re privatisation more seriously I have no issue with privatisation for non core services be it gardening, hospital maintenance or whatever but I do have an issue when it comes to cherry picking core services and patients ‘that would best optimise profit margins and performance stats’.
Shurely shome mishtake...
For what? Accident leaves you paralysed. Have you paid enough tax for your lifetime care?
Because half the time it's on zero hours contracts with the state picking up the cost of subsidising the cheaper private employer.
What about core services that are not cherry picked and which are not outsourced to optimise margins and performance stats? You've framed your reply in a very slanted way.
What you're saying is you are not in favour of bad privatisation. Well no shit, Sherlock. What about privatisation done well? Why are you opposed to that? Ideological grounds or some sound reasoning of which I am unaware?
with any luck....can't believe she's still hereIf May doesn’t get hold of the NHS problem quickly- it will bring down the government. This situation could spiral out of control very quickly.
If May doesn’t get hold of the NHS problem quickly- it will bring down the government. This situation could spiral out of control very quickly.