JohnMaddocksAxe said:
S04 said:
JohnMaddocksAxe said:
Whatever my plan for financial sustainability would be (and it's a bit arrogant for anyone on here, without access to the exact figures to think that they know the minute knowledge of such plans), it would not include the totally financially insignificant issue - in terms of the club making an impact on it's spending - of shafting loyal fans with ticket price rises or allowing wankers with no connection to or feeling for the club to jump in front of genuine fans in the queue for tickets for big games.
You seem to be suggesting that such things lead to financial sustainability.
The only tenuous link you could make is that you might get some contacts or investment if you allow such people to take tickets. But I hardly think that anyone genuinely important would be plonked amongst the away fans.
I'm struggling to think how you are connecting the development of a worldwide fanbase (not my choice of phrase as I don't class someone on the other side of the world as a fan - maybe an interested, delusional observer but if they want to delude themselves and spend their money on City branded tat then that is their business and good for the club) and allowing a miniscule amount of people to take tickets that would otherwise be open to genuine fans of the club. Are you suggesting that these people then go back to wherever they are from (Milton Keynes, Amsterdam, Hong Kong, wherever) and are like evangelical preachers converting millions of susceptible fools to 'city fans' and allowing the club to break even?
I somehow doubt it. It is irrelevant in terms of financial sustainability, so I don't know why you connect the two.
Well, for every City-shirt sold in the UK there are two sold outside UK. That is a scale of importance surely..Those that buy those shirts might want tickets, and they will get them eventually.
We can´t afford to alienate them for the same reasons as the rags, Liverpool, Barca and others cater to them. They spend big while local fans spend as little as possible.
The percentage of shirt buyers outside of the UK who want tickets for the likes of Arsenal and United away is so small that it is not even worth discussing. 99.9999999% of them will never go to a City match and they will still buy the shirts. So why shaft the proper fans over it and deny them tickets to big games, just to satisfy the sad desires of those rich enough to be able to travel to watch a far away team they have latched on to.
Anyway, there is plenty of room for such people at home games and I personally haven't got an issue over a small percentage of tourists turning up there. There is room for that.
Remind me how much money such tourists are spending at the City shop on a day trip to the Emirates?
It's bollocks, there is such a small amount of tickets for such fixtures that to give priority to day trippers (only those who can afford to pay a big wedge mind) is a joke and it shafts actual fans. At home games, well, there is room for it to happen.
None of it has a huge impact of the club's bottom line though as the foreign markets that they (and other clubs) are cynically targeting consist overwhelmingly of numpties buying tat branded with the badge of a club they've never get anywhere near.
I'm a blue from Manchester but i have lived in London for about 20 years since I was 21. Prior to that I have been going since the 80's at Maine Road, less so COMS but always tried to do as many South East Away games as I can, it's harder nowadays with the points, but sometimes I can still get them with my citycard, season ticket holders get them for me, or I pick up the odd one from here. Sometimes I notice the away support is not as "intense" as it used to be, but then when I go back to the Blue Camp and sit in the 300's I think this ain't the crowd i used to be near in the North Stand, Platt Lane, Kippax, even the Main Stand. The truth is football crowds are more diluted now, they have been for years, like it or not the banning orders have quitened the crowds, the prices have, we are all a bit older, the younger fans haven't really experienced a proper mooch at an away, it's all sanitized, family friendlier. Our fan base is simply less hostile than it was, most clubs are, maybe this is magnified in the smoke, a lot of exiled blues in London are professional types, who demographically may be less likely to create an atmosphere, unlike gangs of teenagers and early 20 somethings with less repsonsibilty and social awareness. Day trippers at all top EPL clubs are a fucking fact, some of you better get used to them. I don't want them getting tickets over loyal blues, but that's the way of the world. All this moaning makes me laugh, I ain't a season ticket holder, but I got to Schalke Lokeren, Bayern, the Semi the charity shield, the Final, Gillingham, Bradford in 89. Where there is a will there is a way, any fucking blue worth his salt who lives in the UK has some income, and no family illness to deal with would have been at Wembley last April and May, yet there were people on here bleating about not have tickets and watching in some shit pub in farringdon.
Finally, I have watched doemstic fixtures in Portugal, Italy, Spain and South America, and no-one has ever been bothered about my presence. Sat in the Curva Noord watching Lazio vs Reg and Gina with about 25,000 others and no one else in the other stands, they seemed quite happy a tourist would want to watch them, same at Bilbao in the San Mames, AC Milan, Cienciano amongst others. Most people seem pleased you are showing an interest, I don't claim to be a fan, but I buy a bit of tat for my collection, got my momento. Even Ajax fans were pleased to host us, and they most get bombarded with pissed stoned english idiots every week. A few excitable japanese types with cameras isn't diluting our fanbase, I'd suggest the moaning minis about standing up smoking general fun police are a bigger menace.
Peace be with you blues