And did the BBC get in a plug for the latest club watch as it disgracefully did last time?odd how they get a comprehensive break down of the previous quarter's finances posted on the BBC News website, posted in glowing terms inevitably.
And did the BBC get in a plug for the latest club watch as it disgracefully did last time?
But I bet they didn't include this, which was in the Financial Times a less star-struck write-up: "Despite the revenue and earnings rise, United reiterated previous guidance that it expects revenues to be broadly flat compared to last year at £575 to £585m, and adjusted ebitda to come in lower, between £175m to £185m compared to £199m in the year to June 30."
And did the BBC get in a plug for the latest club watch as it disgracefully did last time?
But I bet they didn't include this, which was in the Financial Times a less star-struck write-up: "Despite the revenue and earnings rise, United reiterated previous guidance that it expects revenues to be broadly flat compared to last year at £575 to £585m, and adjusted ebitda to come in lower, between £175m to £185m compared to £199m in the year to June 30."
They will for a while but there's a ceiling I suspect. They've become a marketing company ahead of being a football club but if they neglect the football their star will eventually fade.Hi PB, do you think that they will continue posting good results despite potential drops in PL performance. In other words will they retain their customer base with possibly City and others picking up the new global investers to expand rather than pinching fro United ?
With their static revenue and higher costs, we could overtake them this year, although it will never be reported like that.And did the BBC get in a plug for the latest club watch as it disgracefully did last time?
But I bet they didn't include this, which was in the Financial Times a less star-struck write-up: "Despite the revenue and earnings rise, United reiterated previous guidance that it expects revenues to be broadly flat compared to last year at £575 to £585m, and adjusted ebitda to come in lower, between £175m to £185m compared to £199m in the year to June 30."
This may come as a shock mate but I'm not a financial genius, wtf is a ebitda ?And did the BBC get in a plug for the latest club watch as it disgracefully did last time?
But I bet they didn't include this, which was in the Financial Times a less star-struck write-up: "Despite the revenue and earnings rise, United reiterated previous guidance that it expects revenues to be broadly flat compared to last year at £575 to £585m, and adjusted ebitda to come in lower, between £175m to £185m compared to £199m in the year to June 30."
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation. So basically it's operating profit, which is revenue minus direct costs like wages and other general operating expenses such as travel, power, maintenance etc.This may come as a shock mate but I'm not a financial genius, wtf is a ebitda ?
This may come as a shock mate but I'm not a financial genius, wtf is a ebitda ?
Cheers mate, everyday's a school day :-)Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation. So basically it's operating profit, which is revenue minus direct costs like wages and other general operating expenses such as travel, power, maintenance etc.
Doubt it as there's no impact from increased TV revenue this year. We might add £30-40m from increased CL and match-day revenue if we do well in the CL and domestic cups but will be doing well to top £500m I reckon.With their static revenue and higher costs, we could overtake them this year, although it will never be reported like that.