D
D
no you are not getting the point - if you piss someone off they won't even let you in to read their fucking gas meter - I know where they were supposed to be going but having bombed Syria should we be surprised when they get the hump ffs?
Not so much:
Why wouldn’t they let them in if they conclude Assad is not to blame or it cannot be proved one way or the other this is to their benefit no?
Well they aren’t allowed for a start as the last time they did, Russia threw a thrombie in the U.N. and used it’s veto to ensure that they are only allowed to conclude an attack took place and not to speculate on who fired the stuff.According to May's speech today, the inspectors cannot conclude who was to blame for the attack.
According to May's speech today, the inspectors cannot conclude who was to blame for the attack. They're there to establish whether there was an attack and whether it involved chemical weapons (contrary to the Syrian position).
Well the Russian position is now that no chemical attack took place and they were all actors, certainly according to the Russian General Kiam was quoting yesterday.So what disadvantage are the inspectors to Assad?
So what disadvantage are the inspectors to Assad?