Which is why the EU doesn't work.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Which is why the EU doesn't work.
Dextersmate
Well-Known Member
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
The bank does warn in its most recent analysis that the numbers should be taken with a pinch of salt, noting: "We would strongly caution readers against taking the numbers literally: they are very much an upper bound on Brexit effects.
Project fear once again.
The Light Was Yellow Sir
Well-Known Member
I think that makes you an unpatriotic, shortsighted, left wing lunatic, who's just talking the uk down and giving succour to those foreign Johnies on the continent. How very dare you.........
smudgedj
Well-Known Member
Shocker eh? MEP's not happy about Brexit. Give us a shout when they change the word 'should' for the word 'Will'A harsh dose of reality kicks in....
MEPs agree Brexit negotiation plan
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39501876
What are the red lines?
The motion backs a number of positions taken by EU leaders, including the need for a "phased approach" to negotiations.
This would require progress on the terms of Britain's withdrawal, including settling financial commitments, before talks on a future trading relationship can start.
It also backs the call for transparency in the talks, and for the UK to be considered liable for financial commitments that apply after it leaves the EU.
It also says:
- transitional arrangements should be time-limited to three years and be enforced by the EU's Court of Justice
- UK citizens in the EU and EU citizens in Britain should receive "reciprocal" treatment
- the final deal should not include a "trade-off" between trade and security co-operation
- the UK should adhere to EU environmental and anti-tax evasion standards to get close trade ties
- the European Banking Authority and European Medicines Agency should be moved out of London
- the UK should pay towards costs for the EU that "arise directly from its withdrawal"
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
I think that makes you an unpatriotic, shortsighted, left wing lunatic, who's just talking the uk down and giving succour to those foreign Johnies on the continent. How very dare you.........
That and the fact the article goes on to say this......
The bank does warn in its most recent analysis that the numbers should be taken with a pinch of salt, noting: "We would strongly caution readers against taking the numbers literally: they are very much an upper bound on Brexit effects.
So guess work then basically.
Im still waiting for the emergency budget to kick in as well mind.
Dextersmate
Well-Known Member
Dextersmate
Well-Known Member
Guilty as charged,smartarse,:-)I think that makes you an unpatriotic, shortsighted, left wing lunatic, who's just talking the uk down and giving succour to those foreign Johnies on the continent. How very dare you.........
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
His other fine work was entitled the death of British business.
I will give you some credit though as you really must be trawling through Google today to find some of this pmsl.
Dextersmate
Well-Known Member
Yes,thank you,found it on Twitter.;-)His other fine work was entitled the death of British business.
I will give you some credit though as you really must be trawling through Google today to find some of this pmsl.
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
Yes thank you,found it on Twitter.
Ah Twitter...home of the radical remainer.
hilts
Well-Known Member
Wrong again, I'm no grammar Nazi, as my posts testify. I'm not talking about an errant comma, the post was incomprehensible.
Your posts are comprehensible, I think they are misguided, but they manage to get across, more or less, what it is you are trying to say.
Well you're either dumb or a liar, my guess would be the second.
blueonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 2,522
Again and again the snowflakes drag it back to the economic side of things because there is no definitive as yet to how the situation will develop, so they can continue the doom and gloom nonsense.
It was about much more than money.
Sovereignty for a start, but the argument that its better to have decisions made by people who are accountable to the population wins hands down when the alternative is by people who do not have this countries best interests at heart and can never be held to account.
Immigration, another tripping point where their only fall back is trying to equate controlled immigration and mass immigration, being able to Taylor the numbers and skills to what the country requires is a far cry from an open door policy where public services can no longer cope, oh and shout racist a lot because logic is hard to argue against.
The Law, the most important difference between us and the European model. our Law is above and separate from the state, and gives the individual rights and freedoms, theirs gives the power to the state over the individual with no recourse.
Security, argue that a controlled border is somehow not a step up from the free for all we have now as much as you like, but at its base level its no more complicated than a night club, they screen punters to keep the trouble makers out.
It was about much more than money.
Sovereignty for a start, but the argument that its better to have decisions made by people who are accountable to the population wins hands down when the alternative is by people who do not have this countries best interests at heart and can never be held to account.
Immigration, another tripping point where their only fall back is trying to equate controlled immigration and mass immigration, being able to Taylor the numbers and skills to what the country requires is a far cry from an open door policy where public services can no longer cope, oh and shout racist a lot because logic is hard to argue against.
The Law, the most important difference between us and the European model. our Law is above and separate from the state, and gives the individual rights and freedoms, theirs gives the power to the state over the individual with no recourse.
Security, argue that a controlled border is somehow not a step up from the free for all we have now as much as you like, but at its base level its no more complicated than a night club, they screen punters to keep the trouble makers out.
Dextersmate
Well-Known Member
Been trawling for weeks to find a positive.His other fine work was entitled the death of British business.
I will give you some credit though as you really must be trawling through Google today to find some of this pmsl.
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
Been trawling for weeks to find a positive.
Like i said mate its the natural home of the radical remainer.
I enjoyed your first link better to be honest especially the bit that said their numbers shouldn't be taken literally but it was a great doomsday headline so i can understand why you went with it.
sir baconface
Well-Known Member
Meanwhile the glorious standard bearers of the left - those revered by our best-loved Bremoaners - get down to the serious issues of the day.
Was Hitler a Zionist? Is it OK to label Jews Zionists and call them cnuts, or is that anti-Semitic? Should Mr Livingstone be beatified, castrated by machete or merely banned for two years?
Come on, Lennie, you criticise every breath drawn by our PM so how would your merry band of fcukwits handle it?
Was Hitler a Zionist? Is it OK to label Jews Zionists and call them cnuts, or is that anti-Semitic? Should Mr Livingstone be beatified, castrated by machete or merely banned for two years?
Come on, Lennie, you criticise every breath drawn by our PM so how would your merry band of fcukwits handle it?
Last edited:
The perfect fumble
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 26,051
Well you're either dumb or a liar, my guess would be the second.
Go on, treat yourself, double up and have them both.
Again and again the snowflakes
I stopped reading there.
Len Rum
Well-Known Member
I can't hear you mate, I'm focusing on the game.Meanwhile the glorious standard bearers of the left - those revered by our best-loved Bremoaners - get down to the serious issues of the day.
Was Hitler a Zionist? Is it OK to label Jews Zionists and call them cnuts, or is that anti-Semitic? Should Mr Livingstone be beatified, castrated by machete or merely banned for two years?
Come on, Lennie, you criticise every breath drawn by our PM so how would your merry band of fcukwits handle it?
Delph's playing!
Meanwhile the glorious standard bearers of the left - those revered by our best-loved Bremoaners - get down to the serious issues of the day.
Was Hitler a Zionist? Is it OK to label Jews Zionists and call them cnuts, or is that anti-Semitic? Should Mr Livingstone be beatified, castrated by machete or merely banned for two years?
Come on, Lennie, you criticise every breath drawn by our PM so how would your merry band of fcukwits handle it?
Nothing Livingstone said was anti-Semitic and yet again this vast over sensitivity on the issue does nothing but provide a backlash and normalise racist thought.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.