Alexis Sanchez

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think he will end up at Chelsea which will inevitably create a little panic in their rivals boardrooms because if he can add his 15-20 league goals on top of what Chelsea already have they will significantly improve.

He wants a top side that will properly challenge but clearly wants the London lifestyle.

He chose Arsenal over Liverpool - despite Liverpool nearly winning the league - because he didn't want to live in Liverpool / up north.
 
Surely Arse wouldn't be so stupid as to sell to such a close rival? Why strengthen them and make themselves even further from challenging for the title? If he leaves it'll be abroad.
 
I think he would thrive under Pep tbh. I did think he was a marde arse but he has had his chin up and pushed Arsenal a lot on his own earlier this season. Give him a team of hungry top players and he will do very well.

The Riot Club said:
Surely Arse wouldn't be so stupid as to sell to such a close rival? Why strengthen them and make themselves even further from challenging for the title? If he leaves it'll be abroad.
Click to expand...

One name... Wenger! His very life force is ruling that club top to bottom and anything upsetting that harmony will be got rid off to whoever comes first almost. Ashley Cole rocked the boat over pay if memory serves and he was sold to Chelsea. He was a good player and probably had a few clubs after him imo so i can see Wenger doing it just to get rid.
 
aguero93:20 said:
On the evidence of this season? Hazard.
Click to expand...

Sanchez work rate if far more effective to the entire team set up than hazard but hazard is a lot more clinical and effective. Either way, if I had to choose between both of them, I would take Sanchez, he is capable of pulling 3 players away, leaving the rest of his team mates unmarked.
 
TCIB said:
I think he would thrive under Pep tbh. I did think he was a marde arse but he has had his chin up and pushed Arsenal a lot on his own earlier this season. Give him a team of hungry top players and he will do very well.
Chelsea illegally approached Cole and if I remember cirrectly Wenger was not happy to sell him. He never had the option to sell him abroad and prevent him going to a direct rival.


One name... Wenger! His very life force is ruling that club top to bottom and anything upsetting that harmony will be got rid off to whoever comes first almost. Ashley Cole rocked the boat over pay if memory serves and he was sold to Chelsea. He was a good player and probably had a few clubs after him imo so i can see Wenger doing it just to get rid.
Click to expand...

Chelsea approached Cole illegally and if I remember correctly Wenger was not happy. He never had the option of selling him abroad to avoid selling him to a direct rival.
 
Where does he play in our setup? He is not an out and out striker so presumably he takes Raheem's spot.

Other areas of team need work before this.
 
robbieh said:
Where does he play in our setup? He is not an out and out striker so presumably he takes Raheem's spot.

Other areas of team need work before this.
Click to expand...
He doesn't take Sterlings, probably, NolIto and Iheanacho spots plenty of games for 5 to rotate. Other areas will be done at the same time don't only have to do one.
 
Sanchez and Jesus chasing down from the front and some fresh blood closing down from the midfield and full back positions, good luck everyone else.
 
If he came, in one of the 2 8 positions he would be mental, scarily good.
The top players usually drop 10 yards deeper into the later stages of their career and I can see him doing crazy things linking up with Silva in that position
An absolute Bas*ard in the middle of the pitch too.
 
The Blue one! said:
I dont think so. I think to go to the next level we need them both!
Click to expand...

I think they're so similar in their style that it'd be kinda pointless having them both and have one sat on the bench. Makes more sense to have one of them and then a different kind of 9 as an alternative. Someone a bit more physical potentially.
 
BillyShears said:
I think they're so similar in their style that it'd be kinda pointless having them both and have one sat on the bench. Makes more sense to have one of them and then a different kind of 9 as an alternative. Someone a bit more physical potentially.
Click to expand...
It does, my only doubt about selling Sergio is his assertion over the last few seasons he wants to see out his contract and go back to Argentina, so 2 seasons. If that's the case he may decide he doesn't want to sign a 4 or 5 year contract somewhere else which reduces his value for us to very little. I think they are different enough, Sergio is a centre forward and not much else but Sanchez playing centrally is his secondary position Aguero is the better finisher.
 
blueparrot said:
It does, my only doubt about selling Sergio is his assertion over the last few seasons he wants to see out his contract and go back to Argentina, so 2 seasons. If that's the case he may decide he doesn't want to sign a 4 or 5 year contract somewhere else which reduces his value for us to very little. I think they are different enough, Sergio is a centre forward and not much else but Sanchez playing centrally is his secondary position Aguero is the better finisher.
Click to expand...

Also. It's entirely possible that i'm totally wrong and that in actual fact Sanchez will replace Navas/Nolito and won't effect Kun's position at all. That'd be hardcore if true in terms of squad building.
 
BillyShears said:
Also. It's entirely possible that i'm totally wrong and that in actual fact Sanchez will replace Navas/Nolito and won't effect Kun's position at all. That'd be hardcore if true in terms of squad building.
Click to expand...
I really can't see any scenario in which anyone is happy if we have 2 of Aguero, Jesus, Sané, Sterling and Sanchez on the bench in every game. It's just not feasible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top