Alexis Sanchez

Status
Not open for further replies.
Can people please stop posting information from accounts that are either far from reliable or from fake accounts.

The guy claiming he has signed a new contract clearly knows nothing and you'd know that if you just spent 2 minutes on his twitter page and as for the journalist, please stop falling for fake accounts and actually check it's his proper twitter handle.
 
Woah. This would be an amazing and frightening frontline!

I think it's right we're going for more experience up front. As good as Sane, Sterling and Jesus are, young players are inconsistent. We never really knew what we'd get each performance from them last season. Having a basis of Sanchez and Aguero allows us to rotate and takes a little bit of pressure off them.
 
The only one i trust with arsenal news is David Ornstein he has a direct line to the arsenal board so if someone posting an exclusive on arsenal and he doesn't responses to it within an hour it probably is fake news
 
Can people please stop posting information from accounts that are either far from reliable or from fake accounts.

The guy claiming he has signed a new contract clearly knows nothing and you'd know that if you just spent 2 minutes on his twitter page and as for the journalist, please stop falling for fake accounts and actually check it's his proper twitter handle.
Apologies. I was reading the Arsenal forum and the twitter post came up from the guy who announced his previous move. I thought it might be worth sticking it on here. Not been back on their site yet to see what reaction it got.
On topic - my twopeneth is that Sanchez would be a great asset to us, but is far from essential to us winning the league. I fancy us next season with or without him. And for any lurking Tarquins - I fancy the Arse to remain outside the top 4 with or without him ;-)
 
Can people please stop posting information from accounts that are either far from reliable or from fake accounts.

The guy claiming he has signed a new contract clearly knows nothing and you'd know that if you just spent 2 minutes on his twitter page and as for the journalist, please stop falling for fake accounts and actually check it's his proper twitter handle.
The flappers need something to help them stretch their wings from time to time ;-)
 
Sanchez might say something tonight, because he might want to get things done and not drag on
 
You can imagine what the headlines in the Mirror, the Daily Fail, the Star, the Sun, etc would be if Jose and United were after Sanchez.

Then again, it's City who are after Sanchez and......(no link)

img]

I'm all for highlighting those journos that write biased articles against us but I've read this whole piece and it's in no way critical of City. It's critical of Arsenal and Gazidis's comments about turning them into a world-class club. Quite rightly, Dunn states that they can hardly call themselves a world-class outfit if they do sell their best player to us. He even cites the example of them letting van Persie go to United as further proof to back his opinion up. I think if United were interested in Sanchez instead of us then Andy Dunn would've still written this article.

Overall, Dunn isn't too bad when it comes to writing about City. He was scathing of us in the early days of the takeover but I think that's because he felt we had no plan whatsoever and a scattergun approach to transfers. Since then, he seems to have acknowledged that we're far better run than that and has written his fair share of positive articles about us.
 
I agree a bit that this would be a bit of short-term signing, but i think it's necessary one.
I think it's right we're going for more experience up front. As good as Sane, Sterling and Jesus are, young players are inconsistent. We never really knew what we'd get each performance from them last season. Having a basis of Sanchez and Aguero allows us to rotate and takes a little bit of pressure off them.
Totally agree. Although i think with the addition of only full-backs and current signings that the league is within our reach, the Champions League is a different matter. Sanchez and also Alves would be huge assets for us in that competition.

Kompany, Alves, Yaya, D. Silva, Sanchez and Aguero suddenly has the look of a potential Champions League winning group to me. I never really felt we were at that level before.
 
Sanchez might say something tonight, because he might want to get things done and not drag on
If they win I cannot see him saying anything that would take headlines away from his teams victory. I'd be a bit pissed off with him if I was a team mate and he did after winning a significant tournament.
 
If they win I cannot see him saying anything that would take headlines away from his teams victory. I'd be a bit pissed off with him if I was a team mate and he did after winning a significant tournament.
I thought it was the final of the Confederations Cup tonight?
 
If they win I cannot see him saying anything that would take headlines away from his teams victory. I'd be a bit pissed off with him if I was a team mate and he did after winning a significant tournament.
Might come from his agent/pr people pre agreed statement released later on in the night
 
Apologies. I was reading the Arsenal forum and the twitter post came up from the guy who announced his previous move. I thought it might be worth sticking it on here. Not been back on their site yet to see what reaction it got.
On topic - my twopeneth is that Sanchez would be a great asset to us, but is far from essential to us winning the league. I fancy us next season with or without him. And for any lurking Tarquins - I fancy the Arse to remain outside the top 4 with or without him ;-)
Glad you made that mistake before me

I was also reading the same Arsenal forum and was just about to post that 'news' - hope it is bollocks
 
I thought it was the final of the Confederations Cup tonight?
And when was the last time England won a tournament as big? Believe me Germany might not be taking it seriously but other teams who win it reckon it counts and this Chile team definitely will.
 
And when was the last time England won a tournament as big? Believe me Germany might not be taking it seriously but other teams who win it reckon it counts and this Chile team definitely will.
Because Chile want to beat a German reserve team to win it doesn't make it on par with the Euros, Copa America or the World Cup.

I can't recall a manager picking a reserve team for any of those tournaments. The confederations cup is basically a warm up for the World Cup.

Strange point regarding England seen as though this prestigious tournament has only been going since the 90s
 
Because Chile want to beat a German reserve team to win it doesn't make it on par with the Euros, Copa America or the World Cup.

I can't recall a manager picking a reserve team for any of those tournaments. The confederations cup is basically a warm up for the World Cup.

Strange point regarding England seen as though this prestigious tournament has only been going since the 90s
I didn't say it was on a par with the World Cup Euros or Copa America just that it is a significant tournament and more so to some countries than others.

Loads of club sides play reserve teams in the League cup and FA cup doesn't mean that they are insignificant tournaments to the teams that win them. This Confed cup will be significant to Chile if they win it.
 
I didn't say it was on a par with the World Cup Euros or Copa America just that it is a significant tournament and more so to some countries than others.

Loads of club sides play reserve teams in the League cup and FA cup doesn't mean that they are insignificant tournaments to the teams that win them. This Confed cup will be significant to Chile if they win it.
Why does Sanchez want to leave Arsenal and why do Arsenal fans want Wenger out?

Because like the Con Feds Cup the FA Cup is nowhere near the big 2 trophies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top