Aleksandar Kolarov

Status
Not open for further replies.
When they're shite they make it easy.
I can't wait for your verdict on Walker's crossing. ;-)

Walker is a better defender and has more pace but as an attacking full back his stats are not that outstanding compared to Kolarov's. I've included Zaba's for comparison too.

Kolarov 165 apps, 11 goals, 20 assists, cross accuracy 27%
Walker 198 apps, 5 goals, 18 assists, cross accuracy 19%
Zabaleta 230 apps, 9 goals, 18 assists, cross accuracy 17%

Stats are PL only.
 
When you went one further you proved your complete lack of knowledge of football with one of the most stupid comments I've ever read on blue moon .
 
Kola deserves more respect. He isnt unashamedly lazy, he is just slow. He is far from perfect but he has done a lot for the club and is a genuinely magificent ambassador for the club.
 
I can't wait for your verdict on Walker's crossing. ;-)

Walker is a better defender and has more pace but as an attacking full back his stats are not that outstanding compared to Kolarov's. I've included Zaba's for comparison too.

Kolarov 165 apps, 11 goals, 20 assists, cross accuracy 27%
Walker 198 apps, 5 goals, 18 assists, cross accuracy 19%
Zabaleta 230 apps, 9 goals, 18 assists, cross accuracy 17%

Stats are PL only.
Walker's gash too. I've expressed as much in his respective thread.
 
What's that got to do with being SPOILT ! Tell you what , don't answer , I give up .

Well he has helped us to win two leagues and appeared in two cup finals we have won. Deserves a modicum of respect for his contribution over the past 7 years. Imo its spoilt not to recognise his contribution.
 
When you went one further you proved your complete lack of knowledge of football with one of the most stupid comments I've ever read on blue moon .
I may have forgotten more about football than you may ever know.

It's OK to be a blind zealot, though, but you just have to recognize it. Do you?
 
Well he has helped us to win two leagues and appeared in two cup finals we have won. Deserves a modicum of respect for his contribution over the past 7 years. Imo its spoilt not to recognise his contribution.

The same recognition given to Joe Hart you mean ?,it won't happen,plus as said earlier he's fucking wank
 
After reading some of the shite in this thread, it's no wonder he spent the last few years in a running slanging match with the fans.

Note to deluded fans: He was good enough for Pelle and Pep, who both trusted him to do a job, especially in the big games.
 
After reading some of the shite in this thread, it's no wonder he spent the last few years in a running slanging match with the fans.

Note to deluded fans: He was good enough for Pelle and Pep, who both trusted him to do a job, especially in the big games.

Great post. You don't have to be his biggest fan to at least recognize he has some talent. We've been an attractive attacking team for some years now and despite his defensive deficiencies he has contributed, as shown by his scoring/passing/crossing stats.
Compare that to the one-paced, negative, regressive talentless player that Sagna was, who got nothing but praise on this forum??
 
Great post. You don't have to be his biggest fan to at least recognize he has some talent. We've been an attractive attacking team for some years now and despite his defensive deficiencies he has contributed, as shown by his scoring/passing/crossing stats.
Compare that to the one-paced, negative, regressive talentless player that Sagna was, who got nothing but praise on this forum??
Well said sir. Unfortunately the need to have a boo-boy that supporters will pick on for no apparent reason whatsoever is something has been ingrained in the culture of of this club for decades.
I Remember Ian Bowyer being hounded out of the club because he wasnt deemed good enough to play here by some so called supporters way back in the 60's, despite later going on to become a title & european cup winner with Forest
 
Last edited:
Great post. You don't have to be his biggest fan to at least recognize he has some talent. We've been an attractive attacking team for some years now and despite his defensive deficiencies he has contributed, as shown by his scoring/passing/crossing stats.
Compare that to the one-paced, negative, regressive talentless player that Sagna was, who got nothing but praise on this forum??
Sagna's one-pace was positively express compared to Kolarov.

Bottom line was he was a left sided fullback who was sli ghtly better than average. The focus of your stats in your argument aren't on his defensive prowess. I also think you're overstating omewhat the guys offensive capabilities.

Yes he goes with trophies but lets not rewrite history. There are plenty of players that won trophies at OT over the years...like Kolarov does not necessarilty make them good players.
 
Yet another long time international player...Captain, no less...who was just not good enough for the champagne and caviar set on the City terraces. Add him to the list.

Shakes head, walks away.
 
Yet another long time international player...Captain, no less...who was just not good enough for the champagne and caviar set on the City terraces. Add him to the list.

Shakes head, walks away.
He's another City unkle. We should definitely keep him forever. He's a proper man. He'd twat you in the face if you needed twatting in the face.
 
I'm confused, is kolarov brilliant now?

He's had great games, ok games and Shite games in equal measure. He surprised me and I thought he was a very good center back last season but a pretty average left back, even worse when we played 3 at the back and he was one of the three. Technically very good.

I'd keep him as he can cover lb and cb unless we buy Bertrand and mendy then adios kola and thanks.

Oh and to say he was a more complete full back than zabaletta is pure nonsense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top