Bit over the top but I agree with the gist of that, anyone using Harts time in Italy to say he wouldn't have done any better is just fooling themselves, he never once had season as bad as Bravo did at City... he'd have saved us more points but we probably still wouldn't have won the league with that defence and the wastefulness upfront.
It's true he gets far more criticism when he makes the same mistakes as others(not even at a higher frequency either). I think just a matter of at his best he's and exceptional shot stopper at his worst frustrating because you know he could have saved it had he been focused, most of the time he's just been a very good keeper he's had his lows and highs in terms of form but if anything he's spent more time showing his best form than his worst.
Having said that there's a lot of hypocrisy from fans regarding the keeper situation when you really think about it:
One the one hand we have those adamant Hart wasn't good enough(bollocks about not being able to dive left and the like) and Bravo would be miles better who still can't bring themselves to admit they were proved wrong last season(Hart and Willy would probably have save us money and points). As a defense they will tell you he was unsettled and not showing his best form for us(which isn't wrong) but then amusing they quickly clamber to tell people of Harts season in Italy so "Harts still shit you see". We've had to shell out again in a short space of time, where we would have been able keep Willy had it gone to plan but we move on.
On the other hand we have those who value Harts loyalty and service to the club who perhaps afford him more patience than we should allow as a club in our position. They supported him to the extent of jumping on Bravos back before he'd even played a game for us, in the latest tournament in Russia he showed what Pep and many others already knew, he's a very good keeper on his day but he hasn't been convincing in a City shirt unfortunately.