Reina for Bravo?

[mcfcinprague]

Could somebody correct the spelling in the thread title please? It really gets on my nerves and the topic is serious so it deserves a properly spelled title

Although Bravo was fcukin useless last year (on his better days), his track record does suggest there is a goalkeeper there somewhere. Now we've got Ederson, I'm happy to let them fight it out. Who knows, Bravo might come out tops.

If he's still as bad, we can boil him down for glue.

 

[RayCTID]

Both are good keepers but It would be a pointless swap.

 

[Ian]

Looks I'm only one here that rates Reina. Has he massively declined? Because a few years ago he was the perfect Pep keeper. Never understood why the Dippers binned him off.

See what you did there!

 

[sir baconface]

Brilliant :)

Looks like it would resist the steam off my piss.

 

[bumbleblue]

Nah .. I think Bravo will come good this season, or at least I hope he does.

 

[Bill]

Nah .. I think Bravo will come good this season, or at least I hope he does.

We all do mate.

 

[bondsman]

I'd happily have Reina over Bravo. He can catch and is brave. That immediately makes him superior.

 

[kaz7]

Manchester City are close to signing Pepe Reina with an expectation an agreement can be reached in the coming days. [@TelegraphDucker]

 

[dadnlad]

cant see why we just didnt keep willy strange this he was happy as number 2

 

[Barcon]

If we are going to let Bravo leave, you have to wonder why we let Willy go to chelsea.

 

[Bill]

I'd happily have Reina over Bravo. He can catch and is brave. That immediately makes him superior.

i'd have Princess Reina over Bravo.

 

[Bill]

cant see why we just didnt keep willy strange this he was happy as number 2

cos Pep didn't sign him.

 

[J_MCFC21]

Pep could see Reina as a coach further down the line maybe? Knows the prem from his time at liverpool bit like how Arteta helps the first team atm

 

[adaminho]

Id take Bravo blindfolded over this guy.... and thats saying something

 

[TRUE BLUE NO1]

Sam Lee‏Verified account @Sammy_Goal 51m51 minutes ago
Reina doesn't necessarily mean Bravo will be sold (he's already rejected offers). That said, I always assumed older keeper would be Valdés

Sam Lee‏Verified account @Sammy_Goal 23m23 minutes ago
Last I heard: -Plan for 3rd keeper -Bravo *could* go but doesn't wanna, not a priority for City to sell - nobody talking about HG quotas

 

[cadds92]

Why have 3 foreign spots held by GK's?

 

[decmancity]

Bit of a peculiar one to have three very good keepers, Reina for Bravo would be fine. Doesn't matter too much to me which is the backup.

Why are people going on about Willy, pretty sure he was offered a contract but turned it down in favour of going to London, perhaps some pressure from the missus.

 

[kaz7]

Bit of a peculiar one to have three very good keepers, Reina for Bravo would be fine. Doesn't matter too much to me which is the backup.

Why are people going on about Willy, pretty sure he was offered a contract but turned it down in favour of going to London, perhaps some pressure from the missus.

He wanted to stay but wasn't offered a new deal
Bravo won't stand for being 3rd choice imo that is

 

[ninjamonkey]

There's no way in hell we'd sign a third foreign keeper. We don't have the foreign squad space for Nasri or a replacement for Fernando/Delph or two foreign left backs so where the hell does an extra space come from for a third keeper than will never play?

 

[Barcon]

Bit of a peculiar one to have three very good keepers, Reina for Bravo would be fine. Doesn't matter too much to me which is the backup.

Why are people going on about Willy, pretty sure he was offered a contract but turned it down in favour of going to London, perhaps some pressure from the missus.

That would mean that we either planned on getting rid of Bravo or never planned on buying Ederson.