chesterguy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Oct 2007
- Messages
- 1,495
It's a shame, because there are some legitimate grievances with the media coverage that the club receives but threads like this (and the previous "agenda" ones) just get clogged up with petty gripes about fairly trivial stuff, and it cheapens the argument. As a result, outsiders are less sympathetic when we have genuine cause to complain, because we're seen, rightly or wrongly, as a somewhat paranoid fanbase.
It's better to rise above most of the stuff that is written about us. The newspaper industry is in steady decline, and our successes are all the sweeter knowing that the likes of Ogden, Jackson etc are willing us to fail.
I absolutely agree with this BUT I do feel that one or 2 posters come across as slightly smug when trying to negate the arguments that those of us who feel there is a bias. Now there have been so many comments made about media bias that surely those who say there isnt have got to think why do so many people feel that way are they all wrong?
As has been said so many times before whether it is bias for one team or bias against another I am sure we can all agree that there is an imbalance in how the media on different clubs. Now we can surely understand why a url with Ronaldo- United-Transfer will generate alot of clicks and basically that is what our media has got to.....clickbait
Is it annoying yes, do we feel it more bearing in mind that our noisy neighbours gain the biggest benefit from that imbalance probably but as Ric says we have to learn to pick our battles as whilst Sky and News Corporation do what they do us railing and ranting shouting "its not fair" over every perceived imbalance will just make us look slightly small time as they will not change as its the only thing they have got
The way to change the view and attitude of the media is with sustained success as then it will be in their interests to write positive articles