Is that actually true though, or is it just more bullshit trying to smear PSG because they're owned by those dodgy Arabs?
I'd assume it's pretty standard that the player himself doesn't literally pay the release clause and the money comes from the buying club.
The assumption would be it came from PSG, so its a bit premature to say they have got one over FFP. We don't know what sales they will make to balance the books , but it will all show up in there accounts so they will either pass or fail FFP.Is that actually true though, or is it just more bullshit trying to smear PSG because they're owned by those dodgy Arabs?
I'd assume it's pretty standard that the player himself doesn't literally pay the release clause and the money comes from the buying club.
The way I just read it was he paid the release clause and was for a short time out of contract, would've been a big fuck you to psg had we swooped in and signed him on a free (payback for Dani Alves)Is that actually true though, or is it just more bullshit trying to smear PSG because they're owned by those dodgy Arabs?
I'd assume it's pretty standard that the player himself doesn't literally pay the release clause and the money comes from the buying club.
Is that actually true though, or is it just more bullshit trying to smear PSG because they're owned by those dodgy Arabs?
I'd assume it's pretty standard that the player himself doesn't literally pay the release clause and the money comes from the buying club.
Dont think they r "pissed" money they get, but they lost the player to PSG. and feel that PSG have not folowes or repected the FFC rules, to make fair trade.
what i hate about this, is what will it be next year 80m for LB or RB, team can demand 160-180m for avrage striker!
I dont like what PSG did.[emoji35]
That's funny as fuck.Thats how it started though, they tried to tap up Verratti, so PSG went after them. Anyone tries to tap their players up and PSG will come back and nick your best player. Love it!
Dont think they r "pissed" money they get, but they lost the player to PSG. and feel that PSG have not folowes or repected the FFC rules, to make fair trade.
what i hate about this, is what will it be next year 80m for LB or RB, team can demand 160-180m for avrage striker!
I'm curious as to what team you support ?Dont think they r "pissed" money they get, but they lost the player to PSG. and feel that PSG have not folowes or repected the FFC rules, to make fair trade.
what i hate about this, is what will it be next year 80m for LB or RB, team can demand 160-180m for avrage striker!
I dont like what PSG did.[emoji35]
The PL might be disappointed next time the domestic contract is up for renewal. BT seem to be struggling for viewers, and Sky have admitted their viewing figures are falling, a straw poll amongst football fans I know (mainly match goers to be fair), suggests at least, that people are drifting away from Sky, and not renewing their contracts, we were chatting at work last night, fans of three different clubs, and we were all watching considerably less games on TV.The Premier League expect the TV deal to go up nearly 40% globally from 18/19 so regardless of PSG, transfer fees were going to get even bigger anyway.
The PL might be disappointed next time the domestic contract is up for renewal. BT seem to be struggling for viewers, and Sky have admitted their viewing figures are falling, a straw poll amongst football fans I know (mainly match goers to be fair), suggests at least, that people are drifting away from Sky, and not renewing their contracts, we were chatting at work last night, fans of three different clubs, and we were all watching considerably less games on TV.
Jonathan Wilson was talking about this today on the Guardian pod.
He said that despite sky numbers going down, the Premier Leaugue expect a small increase on the domestic deal, basically staying the same, but the global deal to go up from £3Bn to over £5Bn.
Haha. Deal with it Barca fanboy.Dont think they r "pissed" money they get, but they lost the player to PSG. and feel that PSG have not folowes or repected the FFC rules, to make fair trade.
what i hate about this, is what will it be next year 80m for LB or RB, team can demand 160-180m for avrage striker!
I dont like what PSG did.[emoji35]
Fair enough, but domestically a lot of fans are turning Sky and BT off.Jonathan Wilson was talking about this today on the Guardian pod.
He said that despite sky numbers going down, the Premier Leaugue expect a small increase on the domestic deal, basically staying the same, but the global deal to go up from £3Bn to over £5Bn.
The PL might be disappointed next time the domestic contract is up for renewal. BT seem to be struggling for viewers, and Sky have admitted their viewing figures are falling, a straw poll amongst football fans I know (mainly match goers to be fair), suggests at least, that people are drifting away from Sky, and not renewing their contracts, we were chatting at work last night, fans of three different clubs, and we were all watching considerably less games on TV.
As far as I'm aware, it's no longer classed as an income but as a capital gain.If PSG gave Neymar the money to buy himself out, won't he have to pay tax on it - it's either a gift, or a salary or a bonus or whatever. In which case, won't they have had to give him £300m+ to pay the tax bill?