Not sure if this was sarcasm, if it was then I accept the whoosh .... but can you honestly see the British press coming to our defence? Sly, scum and dipper journos will jump on this and enjoy ridiculing the club.
hahahaha!C***s
Its this bit that the club should respond to "The body claimed "both PSG and Man City benefit from sponsorships that make no economic sense and lack any fair value".
if anything our sponsorship deals are currently undervalued but who the fuck do they think they are dictating what is fair or not. Least we pay our taxes and don't get court cases for tax fraud like a few players of certain Spanish clubs
Its this bit that the club should respond to "The body claimed "both PSG and Man City benefit from sponsorships that make no economic sense and lack any fair value".
if anything our sponsorship deals are currently undervalued but who the fuck do they think they are dictating what is fair or not. Least we pay our taxes and don't get court cases for tax fraud like a few players of certain Spanish clubs
I think you've missed a few noughts off that figure!Also Real (Franco) Madrid sold their training ground to the Spanish Government several years back for three times its value when they had financial problems and then we're given it back for a peppercorn rent!!! The saying those who,live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones come to mind. Also the prawn who suggested City should be investigated forgot to mention or didn't know that City sold players to,the value of 98 million as well so the oval spend by us was about £115 million well within are income budget. UEFA also need to debit a clubs debt into it's FFP calculation as if they took it off their overall profit City would be above United, Barceleno and Madrid in the richness clubs list. As per say United debt is about £540000 at present then surely this should be taken off the total value of the club.