StrangewaysHereWeCome
Well-Known Member
I'm sure this has been quoted a couple of times already but, hey! It's triggered me. If any of you cockney redcafe bellends are reading this could you please pass this answer on (They wouldn't let me register)Still deluded and clueless.
Rag Cafe.
SchneckerlNew Member
Joined:
Jun 17, 2016
Messages:
617
Honest question about City, which I'm sure has been asked/answered countless of times over the years:
Why did ADUG decide to acquire Manchester City out of all possible clubs in England? Wouldn't Aston Villa or Leeds United make more sense based on market/potential fan base?
Also.
Also the fact that Manchester United are recognisable worldwide. I think they hoped people wouldn’t notice the one word difference.
1. They pinpointed a couple of potential acquisitions. Newcastle and I believe Liverpool were the others. They settled on City partly because of previous dealings with the previous owner, Little Frank.
2. What makes you believe Leeds or Villa are more marketable?
3. I'm sure you amused yourself with the worldwide recognition "joke" now wipe up your dribble as you contemplate this: City are the star of the show now The Manchester derby in 2011/12 season was the most watched game because people wanted to see CITY. United are now known as the old team, an ousted despot, a sad old relic taking that lonely walk back to the pavillion and only recognized as a joke. You know this is true and the ribbons are already being tied to the premier league trophy.
Has anyone kept a count of his (Pogba) different haircuts?