And now he's gone for Keita for the same price as both of them, what does that tell you?
I'm wondering what your end game is here. You obviously started with trying to deny Liverpool might get better, presumably out of worry about next season. Now you've gone through a pathetic attempted semantic argument ("Much better" vs. "Massive improvement"), then tried to pretend better players won't improve Liverpool because they might not fit - despite the fact everyone knows Keita suits Liverpool to a tee - now you seem to be pointing out that Klopp has a good track record of buying midfielders who fit his style in order to say...he's not going to get it right with Keita?
None of your arguments make anything close to sense because you're not actually arguing anything, just trying to come out with the next piece of mental gymnastics to excuse your original shit point that Keita isn't going to make Liverpool stronger. He is, get over it! They still aren't going to get near us, they still are going to have him supported by James Milner and Jordan Henderson. Stop being so pathetically scared of an opposition team improving that you have to abandon all common sense to argue about how it might potentially not happen.
OK BM's No. 1 Football Scout, as for my original quote I said "in my personal opinion" Keita wasn't an upgrade on Can, 1 player in, 1 player Out. You then went on to brag about how you've watched 20+ games of Keita and he's a massive upgrade on Oxlade Chamberlain.
Following on from that you get personal which is not needed and fucking childish. As for quoting it's a "FACT" that everyone knows Keita suits Liverpool to a tee, it clearly isn't until he plays for Liverpool.