The Preacher
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 24 Nov 2009
- Messages
- 1,528
Hope he wasn't wicketkeeper.
Or silly mid-on.
Hope he wasn't wicketkeeper.
Would have been agreed by the club first. That's how it works these days. Even charity matches have to be agreed.Because they're professional sportsmen at the top of their game and shouldn't be risking any injuries by fooling around.
You'll notice its not his left side :-)Has he had something covered?
You'll notice its not his left side :-)
Just finished reading an excellent new book, 'From Guernica to Guardiola' about the development & importance of the Spanish influence in English football and there#s an interesting piece in about Hart. It confirms what I've said before on here that it was well-known in Spain, well before (2 or 3 years before) Pep was linked with us, that City were looking to get rid of him.
Is he a gambling man though?
Like I said same old same old, insinuation without any back up, well apart from my source said 100% believe it, blah blah blah.
Man up and prove it, lay it out on the table or don't bother.
Yep,Mancini wanted the Stoke lad as his replacement.It was widely reported here in the UK that Mancini wanted shot of him.
That’s 5 years ago.
This is the post of the entire thread...Those talking about Joe's "loyalty" and his "loving this club" are clueless.
It was widely reported here in the UK that Mancini wanted shot of him.
That’s 5 years ago.
What does gambling have to do with his loyalty and his love for the club?
Not sure if that is a serious question...I assume it is not.
I'm certainly not itk in any way but could it be what someone would gamble on and how a figurative someone influenced a bet? Of course, this is all hypothetical.Of course it is. You are saying that he doesn't love City and had no loyalty because he gambles. Is that right?
I don't have a clue how you came to that conclusion.